Sunday, 14 July 2019


Have you ever wanted to see a sexy woman-prawn hybrid?

Blibdoolpoolp the Sea Mother, goddess of the Kuo-Toa  (Erol Otus, AD&D Deities & Demigods, TSR, 1980)

The single strangest concept for a goddess I have ever seen.

A prawn, but it wants to have sex with you.

I’m not the only one to have noticed it.

This is what that goddess’ worshippers look like.

They have no interest in humans sexually - from memory, they eat and/or kill all they encounter. So why worship a goddess that looks like this?

Well, my head-canon is that they are pretty stupid really, and they came across a statue created by some long lost human civilisation, and worshipped it blindly, and that made a goddess in that image.

Because humans have always made animal headed gods and goddesses - I’m told it’s not mean to be literal, that the civilisations were just thinking metaphorically, but these fish monsters wouldn’t know a metaphor if it slapped them across the face.

They know how to bash, how to chew, how to make more of their kind, and that is about all they do - except the original game had some of them as good martial artists - for no apparent reason.

This is the 5th edition version.

 I don’t really recall them being creative, or being builders of anything (they seemed to use whatever underwater ruins they found), and generally they had no personality. They were just obstacles. The Drow were a thousand times better.

I’d like to include a picture but Tumblr would shut down my account. It’s funny that the pictures that adults yawned at as being fine for kids are now too naughty for Tumblr.

I think she was topless in the original version.


See, the Drow having sexy gods that wanted to sex/kill you made perfect sense, but the Kuo-Toa ?

You are the Dancing Queen”(*bloop*)
Young and sweet, only seventeeeeeeen
Dancing Queen
Feel the beat from the tambouriiiiine, oh yeahhhh (*waggles claws*)

See, there’s the worshippers slaughtering the human scum, and Blibdoolpoolp is off in her own world up there, dancing away in the spotlight...

“Pardon me, Human, but can you direct me to Coachella?”

Wednesday, 17 April 2019

Katie Bouman - the myth versus the truth from

Date of archive: 11 Apr 2019 07:06:04 UTC

She didn't lead the team, and was falsely given sole credit for political reasons. She was just a member of a very large team who worked on the project.

The Haystack EHT team includes John Barrett, Roger Cappallo, Joseph Crowley, Mark Derome, Kevin Dudevoir, Michael Hecht, Lynn Matthews, Kotaro Moriyama, Michael Poirier, Alan Rogers, Chester Ruszczyk, Jason SooHoo, Don Sousa, Michael Titus, and Alan Whitney.

Additional contributors were MIT alumni Daniel Palumbo, Katie Bouman, Lindy Blackburn, Sera Markoff, and Bill Freeman, a professor in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.

Wednesday, 27 March 2019

Is Milk Anti-Semitic?

This is insane.

"Board of Deputies says Suella Braverman should pledge not to use phrase linked with far right "

For one thing, "far right" needs some definition, because what it used to mean was people who were either Nazis or neo-nazis - and very very few people are. It's now been stretched to cover anyone who votes Republican.

For another - if the far right drinks milk, IT DOES NOT MAKE DRINKING MILK ANTISEMITIC.

That is not how logic works. You cannot discredit an argument by association.

"Cultural Marxism centres around a conspiracy theory "

The trouble with the use of "conspiracy theory" is that it is loaded language. Here is a conspiracy theory - marxists plotted to install communism globally. It is a theory that marxists worked together. It's also trivial to check that it is true, and they are quite open about it.

Saying something is a conspiracy theory is an underhanded way of saying it is false without requiring proof.

"Many of the academics of the critical theory movement were Jewish"

Yep. So if a few Jewish people were bad, and you oppose badness, then you oppose Jewish people? WTF!

Nazis were German and white. Nazism was bad. Opposing Nazism didn't make you anti-German or anti-white!

Here is the definition the majority of people use when they mention "cultural marxism":

A social and political movement that promotes unreason and irrationality through the guise of various 'causes', often promoted by so-called 'social justice warriors'.

These causes and their proponents are often contradictory and are almost never rooted in fact.

Indeed, true argument or discussion with proponents of these causes is almost impossible, as most attempts at discourse descend quickly into shouting, name-calling and chanting of slogans.

Otherwise known as the 'regressive Left' - a play on their contradictory nature, specifically on how SJWs describe themselves as 'progressive' yet display strong authoritarian, 'regressive' tendencies.

This term is even often used by members of the true Left who take reasonable stances based on logic and evidence, and are eager to distance themselves from the fanatics who have effectively hijacked their side of the political spectrum.

NOTE: Naturally, Cultural Marxism itself is described by SJWs as a 'conspiracy theory', in an attempt to delegitimise their critics.

Some examples of Cultural Marxism include:

- Political Correctness.

- Privilege.

- Third-Wave Feminism.

- Anti-Capitalism.

- Anti-Islamophobia.

- Identity Politics.

- Anything that involves perpetual anger and outrage, denies personal responsibility, demands the surrender of personal liberties as a form of appeasement, or legitimises what would normally be considered madness.

Or a combination of all of these characteristics.

by OrionSlaver May 28, 2016

Sunday, 3 March 2019

Is the BBC pushing a Trojan Horse?

Archived from

Date: 1 Mar 2019 20:48:37 UTC

This looked so promising...

"Calan said it had seen a significant increase in people coming forward.
It wants funding secured to continue what it believes is the first UK scheme of its type - to tailor support specifically to men."

But then I read:

"Sessions for men are shorter, but also include a focus on the role of masculinity and gender stereotypes"

I had a look at the help offered - it looks like it's feminist propaganda targetting vulnerable men.

"A recent report from the UN Secretary General stated that 19 per cent of women between 15 and 49 years of age said they had experienced physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner in the past 12 months.

In 2012, almost half of all women who were victims of
intentional homicide worldwide were killed by an intimate partner or family member, making this issue the leading killer of women worldwide."

I'm going to say the last bit is incredibly unlikely.

The leading killer of women worldwide" is women's male lovers??

So cancer isn't a problem, heart attacks are fine, bombs during wars are not a problem, strokes aren't an issue, diabetes is just dandy?

It's the evil men. Nothing here for them, of course, why would they be, they are evil.

"The level of violence and abuse experienced by all women in everyday surroundings has come to the fore in the last year with the rise of the #Metoo and #Timesup campaigns. "

Yup. False accusations abound, to the point of legal battles. A woman can point and destroy a man's life without him ever getting a trial.

" We all have a part to play in ensuring that the next generation of girls grow up in a world where they don’t have to be scared they will become victims"

Most victims of violence are men. This site doesn't give a damn about them.

This is a bloody trojan horse, targetting the most vulnerable men it can find. I have to wonder if they give them a loaded shotgun and a shot of heroin at the end, to round it all off?

Wednesday, 20 February 2019

Cheddar Man Debunked Links - Swedish Edition

Savage Ruin VIII

Cheddar Man - Verdict

Well,now it appears that the 'muh scientists ' were bullshitting,since they actually had to contend with people who know what they're talking about,who saw through the propaganda.I've now read countless in depth studies which called this as propaganda,and the scientists have to admit it too. New Scientist,only one week after publishing the 'Cheddar Man was black to dark skinned 'story NOW state that the DNA interpretations are not rooted in fact,but are speculation. For those who don't have a subscription,here's the text- "A Briton who lived 10,000 years ago had dark brown skin and blue eyes. At least, that’s what dozens of news stories published this month – including our own – stated as fact. But one of the geneticists who performed the research says the conclusion is less certain, and according to others we are not even close to knowing the skin colour of any ancient human. The skeleton of Cheddar Man was discovered in 1903 in a cave in south-east England where it had lain for 10,000 years. Until a few weeks ago, he had always been depicted with pale skin. This makes some sense, given that people living at northern latitudes often have paler skins. The explanation may be that it allows more of the weak northerly sunlight into their skin, so they can make enough vitamin D. And it seems our species reached Europe 30,000 years before Cheddar Man lived, so his ancestors would have had plenty of time to evolve paler skins. But the new DNA analysis suggests that Cheddar Man may have had dark skin. Most news stories said his skin was “dark to black”. Giveaway genes To show this, researchers including Susan Walsh at Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis read Cheddar Man’s DNA. Walsh had helped develop a model that attempts to predict someone’s eye, hair and skin pigmentation solely from their DNA, and the team applied this model to Cheddar Man. The most recent version of the model was published in May 2017. It focuses on 36 spots in 16 genes, all linked to skin colour. To test it, Walsh and her colleagues took genetic data from over 1400 people, mainly from Europe and the US but also some from Africa and Papua New Guinea. The team used part of the data to “train” their model on how skin colour and the 36 DNA markers are linked. They then used the rest of the data to test how well the model could predict skin colour from DNA alone. The model correctly identified who had “light” skin or “dark-black” skin, with a small margin of error. When Walsh and her colleagues applied the model to Cheddar Man, they concluded his skin colour fell between “dark” and “dark to black”. Not so sure The research was first announced by press release, to coincide with the release of a TV documentary. It has now been posted to a preprint server. Walsh stresses that the study doesn’t conclusively demonstrate Cheddar Man had dark to black skin. We cannot place such confidence in the DNA analysis, she says. For one thing, Cheddar Man’s DNA has degraded over the last 10,000 years. “It’s not a simple statement of ‘this person was dark-skinned’,” says Walsh. “It is his most probable profile, based on current research.” In fact, we are not ready to predict the skin colour of prehistoric people just from their genes, says Brenna Henn at Stony Brook University, New York. That’s because the genetics of skin pigmentation turn out to be more complex than thought. Too many genes In November 2017, Henn and her colleagues published a paper exploring the genetics of skin pigmentation in populations indigenous to southern Africa – where skin colour varies more than many people appreciate. Just weeks before, a group led by Sarah Tishkoff at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia had published a paper on the genetics of skin pigmentation in people from eastern and southern Africa. “The conclusions were really the same,” says Henn. “Known skin pigmentation genes, discovered primarily in East Asian and European populations, don’t explain the variation in skin pigmentation in African populations. The idea that there are really only about 15 genes underlying skin pigmentation isn’t correct.” It now seems likely that many other genes affect skin colour. We don’t know how. If we are still learning about the link between genes and skin pigmentation in living populations, we can’t yet predict the skin colour of prehistoric people, says Henn. This debate may seem of little practical importance – although the idea that Cheddar Man was dark-skinned generated enormous public interest. However, we need to know the limitations of this sort of genetic technology. Police could one day plug DNA from a crime scene into one of these models to determine what a suspect looks like. Walsh’s model might succeed at this in the US, says Henn, because it was trained on DNA from people with similar ancestry to North Americans. But it may well fail elsewhere. Henn’s team has tested an older model that aimed to predict skin colour from DNA. When they put it to work among southern African populations, “it literally predicted that people with the darkest skins would have the lightest skin” Would the BBC now like to shout THIS from the rooftops??

Friday, 8 February 2019

SJWs decide to DESTROY Vic Mignogna.

Friday, 8 - 02 - 2019

These photos are only being posted in hopes that it helps with adding evidence against Vic to help the victims. The photos are not of me but of my girlfriend. We were both huge Vic fans and in 2006 we got to meet him at Anime Evolution. We ate dinner with him and several other fans (at the guest dinner arranged by the convention).
Now don’t misunderstand me. Obviously my girlfriend is happy in these photos. She was. We were both very excited to get to meet him. Fullmetal Alchemist was our favorite anime at the time. She did ask for a photo with him but the extremely close hug and kiss on the cheek were things that he executed without asking or warning. Being that it didn’t make my girlfriend uncomfortable at the time doesn’t mean this behavior doesn’t happen to other people who DID get uncomfortable.
Now remember that these were from Anime Evolution 2006. Mandy was 17 years old at the time. I truly believe that as a 31 year old now, if this were to happen again I can guarantee the reaction would be different.
TLDR - Vic DOES behave this way at cons. Just because someone is happy about the attention does not  1.)make it okay. and 2.)mean that everyone appreciates it.
“Evil triumphs when good men do nothing”
I couldn’t have said it better myself Vic.

My response:

“ Just because someone is happy about the attention does not  1.)make it okay. “

It literally does. He is just kissing someone on the cheek, and no-one has gone to the police with a complaint. He has done this for years without complaints, and fans have asked him for it, and have been on record as saying that.

You don’t get to decide whether or not others are allowed to do things. Social Justice does not (yet) write the law.

The only reason SJWs are now targetting him is because he refused to sign gay porn at a convention, because he is a Christian.

Take Jamie McGonnigal‏. Jamie has been one of Vic's main accusers.

Jamie and his fellow progressives believe that Christians are pedophiles.
Huh.Well, that sounds like a very... unbiased... judge of character, doesn't it?

Saved from
10 Feb 2019 10:17:26 UTC

“ 2.)mean that everyone appreciates it. “

Which is why you have words that you can use - you can say NO. Wow, that was hard.

“ Just because someone is happy about the attention does not  1.)make it okay. “

It literally does.

You don’t get to decide whether or not others are allowed to do things. Social Justice does not (yet) write the law.

“ 2.)mean that everyone appreciates it. “

Which is why you have words that you can use - you can say NO. Wow, that was hard.

I noticed I never see this shit when an SJW celeb kisses a fan on the cheek. Hell, Miley grabbed boobs and dicks.

Madonna snogged her fans. She was praised by feminists. Same-sex stuff? That’s the RIGHT stuff!






Lana Del Ray loves smooching her fans. Do you think she asks?

The only reason Vic was targetted is he wasn’t into gay porn. He is religious. That was his sin.

And for that sin, Vic had to be destroyed.


Monica Rial was perfectly happy to be chummy with Vic,
year after year,
but when the mob came for him,

she claims she always knew he was a predator?

Further Information:

DM leaks of NPC lying about Vic Mignogna! Photoshopped pictures!!

VIC MIGNOGNA and the Attack on Anime?!

The idea that fans don't like to be hugged by celebrities is absurd.

SJWs have no problems with SJW celebs doing what Vic did.
Yet suddenly everything he did is painted as predatory.

Anime News Network Editor Calls Me a NAHTZEE?!

Monica, Vic, and a fan.

When Monica hugs a fan, that's girl-powah!

When Vic does the same?


Me and Vic Mignogna Part 2 by mimori-kiryu
So, at Kami-Con this year, I re-met Vic Mignogna after meeting him the first time at Dragon*Con 2009! He's such a sweetheart. :)
"I would strongly suggest flagging this particular video for spreading misinformation about a fake Facebook account created to delegitimize a legitimate concern. Only if you agree, of course."

The KickVic movement was built on lies! Leaked Google Doc!!

Summary of NEW Evidence PROVING False Allegations Against Vic Mignogna

The Issue With Vic Mignogna's Poorly Handled Termination from RWBY

The poor wammen are being sexually harassed!

Did the muppets ask for consent before touching?
Elmo says no!
Because false flagging your critics is the Social Justice Way!

Origins of KICKVIC | The 3 Women Who Schemed It All (ANN connection, MarzGurl)


Twitter Is BANNING Accounts Standing Up For Vic! REAL CENSORSHIP

VIC Mignogna Allegations - New footage Clears Vic?

Completely Disproving The Newest Article On Vic Migogna

Monday, 31 December 2018

ABC accuses wypipo of forcing non-whites to bash police

Archived 31 Dec 2018 05:50:27 UTC


Leaders from Melbourne's African migrant communities have accused far-right activists

I immediately thought that this would be a hit piece. Far-right? What does that mean?

Forget about the emotional response to the term, and think objectively about the term - does it now mean anything at all?

It used to mean something precisely - a neo-Nazi if they were from recent times, a member of the Italian or German Nazi movements if from the past. Now I see the ABC use it against all sorts of people.

In fact, a popular feminist branch called "antifa", which tends to do the more brutal acts that most feminists don't have the strength to accomplish, calls anyone who votes for a conservative politician a Nazi - even simply wearing a hat that resembles the MAGA hat will get you labelled - then bashed.

Antifa loves to bash those it calls Nazis.

And Feminists pushed the hashtag "Punch a Nazi" right besides them.

So when the ABC starts calling protestors "Far Right", I want to know what evidence they have for it. Did they record antisemitic speech, for example? Was there a call to attack other countries, or to commit genocide against minority groups?

Well, if the ABC knows about such evidence, it has, in its wisdom, kept them from the police, because they weren't charged with any of that.

So what did they do?


They protested legally, as is their right.

"There are unwritten codes you have to live by to ensure you are not threatening to anyone in society."
Since when? Oh right - you can't read these unwritten codes - they are invisible ink. You have to be a true believer in Social Justice to be able to perceive them.

"If someone has committed a crime, it is important to try them before the law... "
So in other words, they hadn't broken any laws. If the ABC had stopped there, that would be fine. But as Feminists, they just can't do that.

"… but be mindful that we have got people in our society that are more disadvantaged than others."


No, we are not required to judge people according to intersectional social justice. We do not have to look at law-abiding citizens protesting legally, and stop them because they offend someone that the Far Left regards as racially superior to them.

Everyone, regardless of sex, race or creed, so long as they are obeying the law, is free to do what they want. That's it. You do not get to be some moral police force, deciding who is free and who isn't on the basis of their genetics.


"They refused requests from the group and police to stop recording"

the police keep telling us that they can record us at their whim. Why can't we record them? We see the ABC recording the activists. Why can't the activists also record public events?

Why is it the Far Left who gets to decide who is allowed to gather evidence of crimes?

"a dispute broke out, during which police allege a 25-year-old man from the football-playing group assaulted an officer."

Like this one. The activists protested legally. The group they protested against - one often accused world-wide of violence behaviour - was violent in response. To the police. Who then turned around and decided that the white people were responsible because white, and the non-whites were not to be judged to the same standard.

We used to have a good word for that.

We called it RACIST.

"The incident prompted Police Minister Lisa Neville to warn that "racism itself does not make any of us safer""

Here's an idea, Lisa: what about not being racist?

What about judging everyone the same regardless of skin colour? That means locking people up if they commit crimes, even if black, and NOT locking them up if they aren't committing crimes, even if white?

Jeez, why is that beyond SJWs? The bigotry of low expectations!

"I think it is really unfair and wrong for any group in a thriving multicultural society like ours to try and incite hatred or fear for one group against the other," Dr Ngum Chi Watts said.
Seriously? I see the ABC doing that all the time. Not a day goes past before they print an article blaming all wickedness on men, and finding excuses for the most brutal acts by women. But recently they have been pushing out anti-white rhetoric, including black supremacist propaganda holding that the people of Britain were black, until the evil white people invaded and murdered them all, and somehow hid that from history.

Turns out SJWs LOVE racial vilification - so long as it is against the correct targets!

"Vic Police Minister says people who 'incite' violence will be held to account"

So... not the people doing the violence - but those who the violent feel provoked them by their existence?

The irony that these are the same people printing domestic violence posters with evil men bashing their wives and saying "I had to do it... she PROVOKED me..."

"However, you can also then take a step back and say 'what has been the reporting when it came to people of colour in the last 12 months?"

This is a term Feminists use to mean "anyone they like". Essentially, they regard all people of English stock as intrinsically evil, and those outside as being better depending on how different they are from that group. But they don't regard them as moral equals - instead, they lower their standards, refusing to treat the "Noble Savages" with the same justice, to view them as just as capable of reason.

They do not see them as equals, but inferiors. It's a peculiar outlook. They see black people as some sort of childlike Eloi race, and white people as the clever but cannibalistic Morlocks.

"    "Those kids, irrespective of skin colour, had a right to be there, just like any other person on that beach. And what was really most upsetting was they were just going about their business."

Yes, all of the people had the right to be there so long as they obeyed the law, and that includes protesting and recording. Getting violent means you should be punished irrespective of skin colour.

So why is the Police force, run by SJWs, and the ABC, ditto, opposed to the very principle they repeat so often?

"Irrespective of skin colour - unless you are white, you scum!"
""it's OK to be white" — a phrase commonly used by white supremacists."

Notice that the SJW 'journalist' here inserts their opinion as fact. How many white supremacists do they know? What was the sampling method?

I'm going to take a wild guess here, a complete stab in the dark, and say they made the whole thing up. "It's okay to be white" was deliberately created to expose the racism of Feminists. Feminists KNOW it is not okay to be white - they hate whites, even when they ARE white, and this phrase is their nemesis, and they won't rest until they have manipulated people emotionally, because they cannot deal with the rational argument it presents.

Here's a question for the ABC: Is it, or is it not, okay to be born white?

Because I think we all know the problem for them. They know in their gut that it is not okay, but they can never admit to it.

So, dear reader, ask yourself - is it okay for people to be white? If not, what Final Solution do you propose to the White Problem?

"Last year he confronted former Labor senator Sam Dastyari in a Melbourne pub and called the Iran-born politician a "terrorist" and a "monkey"".

Oh no, mean words! If this incident occurred, why wasn't that person charged with slander?
The Aztecs, an ethnic group predisposed to commit crime due to its culture
The Nazis, an ethnic group predisposed to commit crime due to its culture
"Dr Ngum Chi Watts said the Australian community must understand that no ethnic group is predisposed to commit crime due to its culture."

In June 2010, through a Freedom of Information Act request, The Sunday Telegraph obtained statistics on accusations of crime broken down by race from the Metropolitan Police Service.[n 2]

The figures showed that the majority of males who were accused of violent crimes in 2009–10 were black.

Of the recorded 18,091 such accusations against males, 54 percent accused of street crimes were black; for robbery, 59 percent; and for gun crimes, 67 percent.[27]

Robbery, drug use, and gang violence have been associated with black people since the 1960s.[28]

In the 1980s and 1990s, the police associated robbery with black people. In 1995, the Metropolitan Police commissioner Paul Condon said that the majority of robberies in London were committed by black people.[29]

Street crimes include muggings, assault with intent to rob, and snatching property. Black males accounted for 29 percent of the male victims of gun crime and 24 percent of the male victims of knife crime.[27]

On sex offences, black men made up 32 per cent of male suspects. Similar statistics were recorded for females. On knife crime, 45 percent of suspected female perpetrators were black; for gun crime, 58 percent; and for robberies, 52 percent.[30]
Operation Trident was set up in March 1998 by the Metropolitan Police to investigate gun crime in London's black community after black-on-black shootings in Lambeth and Brent.[31]

Between April 2005 and January 2006, figures from the Metropolitan Police Service showed that black people accounted for 46 percent of car-crime arrests generated by automatic number plate recognition cameras.[32]

It turns out that certain ethnic groups have always been associated with violence. Gotta say, I thought that it was commonsense that the Amish were safer to be around than Shaka's Zulu tribes, but what do I know?

Here's a radical idea - maybe people from violent cultures currently engaged in decades of violence are violent because the culture they are in is violent, and simply pushing them from one country to another doesn't erase that background of violence.

Feminists constantly say "teach men not to rape!" but then look at men from the Congo - an ACTUAL rape culture, where rape is normal and moral as a weapon against your enemies - and refuse to use that same standard.

Maybe they should be saying that people from such countries need to be taught not to be violent - to Australian police, for example? Just an idea? Too out there?

No, I am not saying that the amount of melanin in your skin determines your behaviour. I am saying not all cultures are the same and some are measurably more violent, and it was only recently that the Police decided that it is politically incorrect to even acknowledge it.

"All these youth are part of our society, so we have to deal with them as a collective"

Far Left types are what is known as "collectivists". They do not see humans as individuals.

"Right-wing activists criticised as un-Australian"

Were they Australian or not? "Un-Australian" is an emotive term which sounds like it means something - but means nothing.

"I am disappointed and shocked to hear that a group of people would deliberately provoke a group of African youth"

I wonder if the police were apologising as they were being bashed? "We are so sorry our faces are bruising your knuckles? We hope our livers don't hurt your toes as you kick them?"

""We know that the actions of the very far right do not represent the views of Victorians."

They seem to be moving further and further right as this story progresses. But if they don't represent the views of Victorians, what were they? Aliens? Demons?

Or maybe they were people from Victoria, i.e. Victorians? Wow! Shocking, huh!

 "Abeselom Nega said the activists' actions had no place in modern Victoria. "

The activists - who were peacefully protesting.

As opposed to those who behaved violently - which he has no problem with!

"The last thing we want is people who want to divide us along races "

If Nega acquires self-awareness, will his brain explode?

"He said he is concerned that the media's reporting on youth crime in Melbourne was fuelling racist attitudes."

So he had no problem with the people committing crime - just the reporting on that crime?

""I just kind of told him 'it's ok mate, I'll pay you with card' … I had to reassure him, more than any passenger would have to do," he said."

Oh no, a driver was worried about not being paid. Probably because of bad previous experiences. So the driver is not allowed to experience fear, because that is racist? It's funny that I constantly see the ABC telling women to be afraid of men because bad men have hurt women!

Here's a novel concept - STOP CRIMINALISING EMOTIONS.

If the driver was afraid, dealing with someone from the group that hurt him before in a civil manner will help abate that fear. Thus, good experiences overcome bad. But it's hardly unreasonable for a driver to want to be paid, and since drivers get robbed (and worse!), they have to be more fearful than the general population anyway.


"He said another friend from an African migrant background had experienced racial profiling while he was crossing the street to do some grocery shopping.

"A lady who was inside her car saw him crossing the road, she told her child to run back into the car, she locked the car, scared that he was going to attack them," Mr Muse said."

Yep, and I've had women react that way to me if I haven't shaved regularly. People will judge you if you look a bit rough. So what?

"He said a second friend who enjoys jogging at night now avoids wearing a hoodie to keep warm in winter because of the reactions of some people on the footpath."

Yes, people assume hoodies will commit crime, because they often do.

If you see someone with their face covered up, running up to you at night, you better be prepared to fight for your life.

Or if you work for the ABC, you just get your chauffeur to drive you to your gated suburb, I guess.

Shocking moment a hoodie-wearing youth throws a lit firework into a 'random' car on a London street

"The teen suspect, who was last seen wearing a gray hoodie..."
Criminals often wear hoodies, as they are effective at countering surveillance.