Thursday, 5 May 2016

Feminists to outlaw "looking" and "commenting" by men as sexcrime.

In fact, one of the way humans reproduced was that they spoke to each other, even when they did not know each other beforehand. This would now be classed as harassment, of course, and should be punishable with severe penalties for any male found doing it, or, if two women are involved, any male found being near by when it happens.


Stop looking at her with your lust,
you rapist!

This graffiti in a neighborhood in Cairo is emblazoned with the words "no harassment" in Arabic.
Here we have a Feminist dealing with men in the approved fashion,
by killing them as the cockroaches that they are.



A reply to

"We want men to stop"


https://theconversation.com/we-want-men-to-stop-honking-their-horn-at-women-because-they-respect-them-not-for-fear-of-punishment-57337

5 May 2016 10:16:30 UTC

(It's been interesting that this street harassment is defined so broadly that any human interaction can be counted. I remember how harassment used to be defined, and that one of the key words was that it was repeated after the person said "no".)

Looking or commenting about these strong and empowered wimmin
is further proof that all men hate all womyn of colour.

The removal of men's eyes and tongues should be mandatory
to prevent more brave and stunning wymyn
from suffering from their gaze.

Let's define our terms.


http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/harassment

" the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands."

Extending that to comments like "hello" and acts like "looking longer than an undefined length of time" is a sign of how brave and empowered strong wimmin of colour have become that they no longer need to worry about "speaking English" or "being sensible".


Having solved the problem of harassment by imprisoning all the males, the next level of approach would be their gentle and harmless extermination, followed by a cleansing incineration and burial.

However, the problem of how to continue funding into harassment continues. Since women cannot, by definition, be responsible for harm - that's the basis of the Duluth Model, after all - the logical solution is, of course, to simply re-designate some of the women as men.

Then they can be blamed for such crimes as "glancing" and "commenting".


Whilst some misogynists might argue that this will result in human extinction, and other white men might mansplain to us beautiful strong and empowered femmes that this wouldn't result in anything but the destruction of Western civilisation at the hands of some "sane" culture (which is ableist, racist and transphobic as well), we all know that utopia is the only possible result.

https://static-secure.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2015/3/27/1427476979699/Andrea-Dworkin-009.jpg
"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp
with a high-heel shoved in his mouth,
like an apple in the mouth of a pig."
We have Listened and Believed. All praise the word of Dworkin!






"Bianca Fileborn receives funding from La Trobe University to undertake research on street harassment."

So it's not like she's going to find anything but the need for more funding. The fact that the many street cameras/phones etc don't show any evidence of the 'epidemic' is just proof of how nasty men are - they turn invisible whenever they attack a strong and empowered wymyn of colour.

"Victoria State Government provides funding as a strategic partner of The Conversation AU"

So this is taxpayer funding being used to create new laws that will imprison men who look at or speak to their 'betters' - women.

FUCK OFF, YOU CUNTS.

And I say that with all due respect.




Further Reading:

Cat Calling:



Male Gaze:


No comments:

Post a Comment

Please try to avoid logical fallacies!