Tuesday, 4 September 2018

Are the changes in asphyxiation laws a Trojan Horse?

This is from the ABC Australia, and of course it works from the Duluth Model - all domestic violence is described using the paradigm of male abuser - female "damsel in distress"

http://www.femdom-resource.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Breathplay.jpg


Choking, non-fatal strangulation offences already in Queensland the focus of new push for WA

Archived: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-23/non-fatal-strangulation-offences-focus-of-new-push-in-wa/10023184 4

Sep 2018 13:22:05 UTC



Now the law is especially focusing on those who use strangulation to any degree. I would have that the assault laws would already cover it, but they are being specific.


Why, I have to wonder? What has changed?


Well one thing that has changed is that a lot of women enjoy erotic strangulation (breathplay). This puts men in an interesting situation where they can be arrested for doing ... precisely what their partner demands they do!



Unfortunately, Domestic Violence organisations are largely run by and for feminists. Have a look at each story on this web page, notice the pattern?


Males are the enemy.


Females are the victim.


There are no gays or lesbians - despite lesbian DV being the highest and gay DV being the lowest.


"The Western Australian Council for Domestic and Family Violence Services, the peak body representing women's refuges in WA"



Women's refuges. Not men's. A body to cover ALL domestic violence victims only cares about female victims of men. There are no refuges for men. There is certainly no acknowledgement that strangulation can be consensual.

  • Women's Crisis Line: 1800 811 811
  • Men's Referral Service: 1300 766 491
Wow! A men's referral service! Surely that would be where men could get help?

Wah wah!! It's " for men who are wanting to stop their violent or abusive behaviour towards their family members"

(Archived:

http://www.dvrcv.org.au/no-to-violence
4 Sep 2018 13:38:38 UTC)


I have to wonder if that means a man can be charged over the wishes of his wife? The poor dear must have internalised misogyny - she can't possibly enjoy such things - she really needs to turn to the light and embrace OUR faith ...


Also - what about auto-erotic asphyxiation? Will men be arrested for masturbation? But that would mean men could be domestic violence victims ... of themselves!


Male victimiser = true but male victim = impossible! (Feminist head explodes)

Note: I am not advocating breathplay. My personal opinion is that it is just too dangerous. But to refuse to even acknowledge women could desire it, and to make up a law that would prosecute any male that agrees to it - that seems to be corruption at work.

We do not criminalise dangerous practices or we would outlaw mountain climbing and diving the oceans. We let adults make choices.

"The Personal is Political" is a Feminist slogan. So too is "Get the Hell out of our Bedrooms". I just wish they would make up their minds.

Further Reading:



Take My Breath Away | A Breathplay Guide

Ask Anything: Can Breath Play Be Safe?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please try to avoid logical fallacies!