Sunday, 31 May 2015

Feminists claim clothes are SEXIST
Saved from
31 May 2015 02:35:50 UTC
Belly baring: A group of students show off their stomachs for Crop Top Day, a protest organized by Canadian student Alexi Halket

For something to be sexist, there has to be a double standard on the basis of sex. Different treatment for men and women, in other words.

So where are the examples of male students who can wear such things? They only exist in feminist fantasies.

I can't find the original creator of this image but I'd like to commend them for having the guts to test this out.

Feminist message: Students wore signs and painted their skin with messages like these, which spoke out against blaming women's clothing for men's actions and reactions

School is there to get you ready for the working world.

How many real-life employers will be happy to have these girls, I wonder?

Oh, right....

Saturday, 30 May 2015

Suddenly, the Sydney Morning Herald notices DV isn't always straight.

Saved from

30 May 2015 10:32:40 UTC

MRAs have been saying this for years. WA is notorious for it's helplines, for example: I don't know if it still does, but it had two: one for women and one for men.

The one for women was to get help for being a victim from a man.

The one for men was to confess abusing a woman.

I made complaints etc - never heard anything about it.

And whenever the ABC says anything about DV, it shows that same model - based on radical feminism - called the Duluth Model - which holds that all DV (and really, everything bad) is caused by masculinity.

Whenever they want to talk about DV, they'll interview an 'expert' -self-appointed, of course - who will explain that it's all because boys read comic books and play video games instead of studying feminism and learning to hate themselves.

The government will occasionally pipe up to cry crocodile tears at the plight of DV victims (meaning women).

In fact, one of the best moments in recent history was when the NSW police force showed a picture of a DV victim - a man - and feminists went mental and demanded it be taken down. There were thousands of pictures of women and one of a man - but that was too much.

Saved from

30 May 2015 10:47:11 UTC

For feminism to work, male victims must be invisible. They must be erased.

Is feminism about equality?

crazymanatmywindow What can men do to help the feminist cause?
Stop draining women. Stop fucking them. Stop expecting they contribute to your overall happiness or fulfillment. Leave women alone. 

"Stop fucking them." Yup, Feminism says men have to either be celibate.. or gay.

But surely this isn't true Feminism? Other Feminists will disagree and remind them what feminism is really about? How men are welcome as feminists, and as lovers?

Of Course not, Silly!

Thursday, 28 May 2015

"Why It's Time For Male Allies To Fight Men's Rights Activists "

Feminist: "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle."

MRA: "Say, isn't that a bit sexist?"

Feminist: (screams) "Help me, White Knight! For I am but a damsel in distress! Save me from these fearsome rape-monsters!"

MRA: "What? I haven't raped anyone?!"

Feminist: "Only a man who raped women would deny the foul deed! Oh save me White Knight, save me!"

MRA: "I think they're off rescuing Anita again"

Feminist: "Oh damn! Look, I've twisted my ankle..." (*shakes coin box hopefully*) "Donations, please?"

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

Wed 27th May, 2:51 am

I had a nightmare about a plague outbreak at a place I was staying at. I woke to find one woman dying, and everyone else in that room sick.

They were in a room that was the only exit... there was no power, and it was dark and I couldn't see what was going on but I heard the laboured breathing of the dying woman. I felt that she was likely suffering but if I breathed near her, I would catch it too.

I ran to escape but my foot was trapped in something unseen. She didn't wake and I didn't know if I could help her, or if waking her would be cruel. I struggled to hold my breath and get out  - but a gasp ended my contest. I might be infected, I didn't know, but I couldn't go near others now.

I was outside, in the courtyard, uncertain what to do. I felt the horror of my cowardice in running from that woman - and horror that I had failed to run well enough and might join her soon.

Was there even someone to call for help? Would we be sealed up and left to our fate?

I awoke, sweating. I had overheated - it happens in these winter nights - and the air on my skin hurt, burnt like ice placed on my skin.

I tried going back to sleep - I have so much yet to do and am running out of time now - I need to rest.

But I couldn't get away from the echoes of that dilemma. It felt as real to me as this does now, that dream.

Sunday, 24 May 2015

lolololololoooollllll provides definitive proof that maybe one in seven women will be raped by the end of this sentence

ncbi. nlm. nih. gov /pubmed/ 21823952 ~~bitch bye
Send to:
J Am Coll Health.
2011;59(7):582-7. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.515634.Reporting rape in a ..
Author information
  • 1UCLA Anxiety Disorders Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1563, USA.

Studies indicate that a small percentage of rapes are reported to law enforcement officials. Research also suggests that rapes perpetrated by a stranger are more likely to be reported and that rapes involving drugs and/or alcohol are less likely to be reported. College women represent a unique and understudied population with regard to reporting rape.

In the current study, the authors interviewed a national sample of 2,000 college women about rape experiences in 2006.

Only 11.5% of college women in the sample reported their most recent/only rape experience to authorities, with only 2.7% of rapes involving drugs and/or alcohol reported. Minority status (ie, nonwhite race) was associated with lower likelihood of reporting, whereas sustaining injuries during the rape was associated with increased likelihood of reporting.

Reporting, particularly for rapes involving drugs and alcohol, is low among college women. Implications for policy are discussed.


Hmm. So it’s 11.5% now, many years later, despite campaigns. It was 16% before by your evidence.

So feminist campaigns have caused rape reporting to panic! Quick! Better stop them immediately!

“Approximately one in seven U.S. women have been raped in their lifetimes“

Straight away that gives me cause to doubt. Scientifically, you just say the percentage with the uncertainty. If you say approx one in seven, it sounds like maybe you don’t know… maybe you are just guessing.

What’s the reference?
1. Kilpatrick DG, Edmunds CN, Seymour AK.  Rape in America: A report to the nation. Washington, D.C: National Victim Center; Charleston, SC: Medical University of South Carolina; 1992.

Oh, that’s not re-assuring. So we are back to the report I dealt with before. So the reference a supposedly scientific paper uses is that it was the opinion of a feminist group.


“Estimates from the 1990s and 2000s indicate that only 16–20% of forcible rape victims report the rape to law enforcement“

As I said before, if you believe what they are saying is true - and so far it’s really not credible - but even if  the voice of God proclaimeth it’s verity, o yea, then what it means is RAPE REPORTING HAS DIMINISHED DESPITE, OR PERHAPS, BECAUSE, OF FEMINIST CAMPAIGNS.

Despite the now ever-present rape support groups, better test kits, free legal advice… this beggars belief.

“College is a high-risk timeframe for sexual victimization, with studies reporting that one in four college women have been raped or experienced an attempted rape.8

And I just lost all respect for this, because it’s using a survey that - frankly, was a hoax - using that as it’s reference. It’s complete bullshit.

I was going to search and find what scientists cited this paper, because that’s how you know how credible it is - but it’s now revealed as just another piece of propaganda.

Well, that was kinda disappointing.

Response to a SJW claiming Paul Nungesser is a multiple rapist


It really irks me how people use Emma’s text messages as proof that she wasn’t raped because
a. It’s not at all uncommon for abuse/sexual assault victims to continue to date or stay friends with the person who hurt them.
b. Traumatic events take a long time to fully process, especially if said victim is in denial about it.
LMAO using Return of Kings as a “source”. My my what a “professional” you are on the matter.
There are people who have studied trauma who do acknowledge that shock, self-blame, and denial are ALL COMMON. But clearly I won’t be able to convince you of that because you will swiftly write them off as “feminists” before sticking your head up your ass. Any study that doesn’t line up with your pre-conceived beliefs is just “feminist propaganda”, amirite?
Jfc I’m telling what I ACTUALLY EXPERIENCED FIRST HAND but apparently because I don’t have a medical degree it doesn't count for anything. How convenient for you. Now you get to disregard every personal experience brought to you by people who have actually experienced the shit you’re spewing nonsense about! WELL DONE~~
“You realise people used anecdotes to prove black people were stupid or Jews greedy? That all gays were pedos and lesbians twisted and cruel?”
WELL OKAY THEN yes let’s take this from one extreme to another because talking about trauma is the equivalent to being a racist homophobe, apparently.
Uhng, try harder. Troll harder.
“The opinions of fellow feminists talking from anecdote has no weight.
“She talked to others afterwards - with no sign of injuries and no sign of discomfort.”
Because showing people your anus is a part of day to day interaction.
“You have no idea of the number.”
A simple google search provides you with this statistic:
“Only 16% of rapes and sexual assaults are reported to the police (Rape in America: A Report to the Nation. 1992 and United Nations Populations Fund, 2000a)”.
And look, a real source! i.e. not ROK.
“Not to you, of course! You believe.
And you believe too. You believe she is a liar, despite the fact that the man who she accused of raping her has been accused of sexual assault by multiple people, some before Emma became famous for carrying around a mattress. Inb4 you claim they were all friends. They weren’t.
And then you close your post with her messages, which I’ve already read and already explained why it doesn’t prove jack shit.
At least you tried.
“LMAO using Return of Kings as a “source”.“

You just don’t get it, do you. The beauty of the truth is it’s the truth no matter who says it. If Adolph Hitler said 2+2=4, then it equals 4. If the nicest person the world has ever produced says it’s 5, THEN THEY ARE STILL WRONG.

And the article there cites their sources - but you don’t read it because you judge the truth of things based on how you feel about them.

You do realise I’m talking to you because I needed an example of SJW stupidity, right? The faulty way they process information, the reliance on logical fallacies, on personal attacks and strawmans...

“what a “professional” you are on the matter.”

Like that one. Quote me saying I’m a ‘professional’, fuckhead.

“There are people who have studied trauma who do acknowledge that shock, self-blame, and denial are ALL COMMON“

Moving the goalposts. Find the experts who agree with your initial argument, not the new watered down version. Find ones that will say the rape victim will, days, even weeks afterwards, PURSUE THEIR RAPIST SEXUALLY.

After a brutal anal rape, during which they allege they were injured, they screamed... and yet mysteriously, were never heard, mysteriously, had no visible injuries...

“In an email to The Daily Beast, Sulkowicz confirmed that these records were authentic and not redacted in any way“

On Aug. 29, two days after the alleged rape, Nungesser messaged Sulkowicz on Facebook to say, “Small shindig in our room tonight—bring cool freshmen.” Her response:

lol yusss

Also I feel like we need to have some real time where we can talk about life and thingz

because we still haven’t really had a paul-emma chill sesh since summmmerrrr

On Sept. 9, on a morning before an ADP meeting, it was Sulkowicz who initiated the Facebook contact, asking Nungesser if he wanted to “hang out a little bit” before or after the meeting and concluding with:

whatever I want to see yoyououoyou

respond—I’ll get the message on ma phone

On Oct. 3, Sulkowicz’s birthday, Nungesser sent her an effusive greeting; she responded the next morning with, “I love you Paul. Where are you?!?!?!?!”

You’ve ignored all of this. You don’t want to know. You certainly seem incapable of addressing my arguments or responding to new information.

You’re a moron, and I think I’ve extracted all possible entertainment from you, so I’ll finish this off and block you. You had a chance to respond - you could have refuted my points in the eyes of other readers, even mine perhaps - but no, no, that would have been work.

“I won’t be able to convince you of that because you will swiftly write them off as “feminists” “

I do not give a shit. I want to see their entries on PubMed or similar accredited journal. No, being a Feminist is not good enough. If they have done scientific research, it has to be peer reviewed, then cited, to have any weight.

You ain’t got diddly except for your feel-feels.



So what? Every religion has someone who experienced first hand the voice of god telling them they, uniquely are hearing the voice of god, and everyone else is wrong.

Your feelz means nuttin’.

A simple google search provides you with this statistic:“Only 16% of rapes and sexual assaults are reported to the police (Rape in America: A Report to the Nation. 1992 and United Nations Populations Fund, 2000a)”.

So your source is from 1992 and you couldn’t even be bothered providing the url?

Fucken oath, you are one lazy piece of shit.


Huh,  maybe it’ll be there.

I search on “Only 16% of rapes”

“The National Women's Study found that only 16% or approximately one out of every six rapes, are ever reported to police”

This is just a reference to another reference... to

A feminist website. Not a scientific reference, not PubMed, or a psychiatric journal - but a feminist organisation.

Your very first reference and


Oh well, don’t feel too bad. No, that’s not fair.


“And you believe too.”

After weighing the balance of evidence. All she has to do to change my mind is to walk to that police station, and make her case to a judge and jury. That’s how it works. She avoided that. Then her texts were exposed... and that was damning.

I’m prepared to shift my position but I’m willing to bet it’ll never come to that because you feminists HATE having your lies exposed - and that’ll happen in a courtroom where you can’t control the narrative, where making up bullshit like your fugue states that last for months will just be laughed at.

You think judges will take your SJW bullshit? think again.


“You believe she is a liar, despite the fact that the man who she accused of raping her has been accused of sexual assault by multiple people”

And yet none of them seems able to talk to the police. How convenient.

“Inb4 you claim they were all friends. They weren’t.”

Don’t care. They know where a phone is. There’s nothing stopping them from calling the cops. He’s innocent until proven guilty - NOT INNOCENT BECAUSE YOU FEEL HE’S GUILTY.

Every lynch mob works the way you lot work. They need an accusation, that’s all, to build up their hate. They don’t think, they don’t want to think, it’s in the way of the anger, and it feels good, being righteous, being a warrior for social justice, and thinking is hard and cold and means YOU CAN BE WRONG.

But thinking is the only fucking decent thing to do, which is why your kind keeps bloody avoiding it.

“And then you close your post with her messages, which I’ve already read”

I don't care if you 'read' them, you didn't reflect on them - it was beyond you....

your name wouldn't be Otto, by chance, would it?

" Rape Trauma Syndrome is recognized by medical and psychological professionals the world over."

Yet it seems strangely absent from scientific journals. Reminds me of when Satanic cults operating childcare was 'recognised' the world over...

Saturday, 23 May 2015

The Epic Tale of One Woman's Desperate Desire for a Mary Sue to Screw.

A response to

Her words shall henceforth be in italic, oh yea, oh yea.

Let’s talk about a house. Let’s talk about a house with the windows broken.

Let's not; that sounds boring.

Let’s talk about a house, burning.


Let’s talk about Sansa Stark of Winterfell. Season 5, Episode 6.

Oh, thank god, I was afraid my jaw would dislocate.

Game of Thrones.

Yeah, we get it.

Let’s talk about that one scene, you know which one I mean,

Nope. What is this, an advertising jingle?

Look - words exist! To describe things! USE THEM.

a bird unfeathered, a princess uncrowned, a mirror smashed,

A skull crushed, a penis severed, a gut impaled...

a village flooded as Ex-Prince Theon is forced to watch.

A  really minor crime is done by a really major villain. Oh noes!

Sansa bent over as Ramsay has his way with her.

Yes, he's a villain. He does evil things. He might be more evil than anyone else in this story, and having his way with his wife is about the nicest thing he's ever done. There's people he's touched who would beg to know that kindness.

The director didn’t stick to the books,

No-one would have watched if they did a straight adaption. The author had no problem with it, the actress thought it was great - the feminists went mental.

Thousands of men suffer miserable fates. They don't care - until a woman they like is treated badly! TIME TO GO INSAAAAAAANE.

Feminism. Because all animals are equal, but female animals matter and male ones can be impaled on stakes for all they care.

Sansa wasn’t raped in the books, the fans cry,

No, the fans are quite happy - the feminists are the only ones objecting.

she’s not supposed to be raped in the show.

Bullshit. It's their show. If you don't like it - don't watch. I'm sure they'll cope, what with the solid gold swimming pools they have to keep them company.

Hold up. No one is supposed to be raped.

Are you brain dead? Oh. I... I'm sorry - brain-injured, I should say. Did you do it to yourself? Well, it's quite impressive. I had no idea you could lose that much and still survive.

Two days later, Emma Sulcowicz carries the mattress

As part of her publicity stunt. Yes, she does that. So what?

across her stage at graduation from Columbia,

Despite it being against regulations, despite it making the ceremony all about her, and despite the fact that legal action has already begun against them for VIOLATING THEIR OWN FUCKING RULES AGAINST HARASSMENT.

and still we question the truth of her accusation,

Damn straight. She begged him to fuck her butt AFTER SHE SAYS SHE WAS RAPED ANALLY.


Sorry, forgot: brain dead. Mah bad.

as if anyone would want to add to the weight

And get lots of money and fame and be invited to talk shows and be applauded as a 'survivor' without any nasty due process or presumption of innocence for the accused....

Yeah, it sounds good to me. Oh, I was raped! Donations pls!


for attention, comments on Huffington Post that can all be translated into different synonyms of liar.

They don't need synonyms.

She's a liar.

She can sue my fat pimply butt if she can prove me wrong, but she won't dare try. Any investigation will blow her out of the water, as you'd know if you weren't a blind zealot.

You never considered the possibility he might be innocent. You just "Listen and Believe", like the good little sheep you are.

But they didn’t follow the plot.

Oh dear. Is it the FBI who didn't? The lizard people? The worms that live in your ears, whispering kill kill KILLLLLL...

Not for Sansa.

Or for quite a lot of other characters - because they want to entertain the audience instead of treating a book as if it was divine. You do know GRR Martin wrote this, not God? It's not blasphemy to make changes?

You know this, right? I mean, you're not trying to incorporate it into some victim narrative - oh, you are!!! Oh. That's hilarious.
God knows Emma was just another of the one-in-five women

Who exist in feminist imaginations only - the one in five crap was debunked ages ago.

it was inevitable, someone has to complete the statistics

Yup, a feminist had to make them up out of their paranoid imaginings. Fortunately, sane people ignore them.

It’s not about how someone refused to follow the storyline.

Oh, for fuck's sake! Fuck off! You have gone on and one about them changing it - and now you pretend you don't care?


It’s about how perpetrators should never write themselves into someone else’s.

You forgot to finish the.

But it sounds like you just accused Martin of being a rapist. Neat trick the way you quit before saying something that would get you sued into oblivion, yet left enough so that hysterical feminist would fill in the blanks. Very nice! Goebbels would approve.

Why do women have to be victims

Why do birds suddenly appear?

before becoming heroes?

You do realise almost all heroic fiction follows that narrative? In fact, someone who just becomes a hero without any struggle is called a Mary Sue and it's the most boring thing imaginable and... oh god! That's what you wanted!

You want Sansa to be carried in, be tossed the crown, firing thunderbolts from her fanny at all the evil menzzz and defeat Sauron, Satan and Sephiroth at the same time. She'd loll back, being attended to orally by Elsa and Anna at the same time, with Loki bringing up the rear ---- and she'd smash the Patriarchy with Thor's Hammer, because she's totally Thor and not Jane Foster (that bitch! She doesn't deserve him)...

Bored now! I'll leave you to your wanking.

Fare poorly.

Friday, 22 May 2015

"Not nationally representative "

"Not nationally representative. "

And yet Feminists *immediately* said it was.

Jessica Valenti

Feminism is built on psuedoscience. It undermines true science where-ever it goes.

It demonises men, by any means necessary, and elevates women, even though by doing so it frees female criminals to prey on women AND men alike.

It is unjust, unequal, and dishonest, and it's time it was chucked into the dustbin of history.

Yet another quiz.

  • 1:What are you wearing?

    Nothing exciting; i'm exhausted and just lounging about in clothes i'll probably sleep in.
  • 2:Ever been in love?

    Since early childhood. My first crush was a gap-toothed girl who was my neighbour - i moved , and missed her a lot. Hannah, i think her name was

    I visited her once, a few years later, but she didn't remember me.
  • 3:Ever had a terrible breakup?

    Many. One was almost funny because it was so incredibly over the top. Another was unbelievably cruel.
  • 4:How tall are you?

    Too tall for the cot I'm borrowing; my feet dangle over the end and i miss my old beds. I have a King Single and a Queen bed, because my spine is rooted. I used to be 5'11 1/2 " but I've shrunk to 5'10 since then due to the damage to my back. I look forward to a future cameo in Ant Man.

  • 5:How much do you weigh?

    Wayyy too much; i have no idea where my scales are since the flood here. I haven't been able to exercise properly - and no, cleaning up after a flood doesn't count.
  • 6:Any tattoos do you want?

    Unless they are electronic and mutable, zero
  • 7:Any piercings that you want?

    See above
  • 8:OTP?

    Use it wisely.
  • 9:Favorite Show?

    The Flash maybe?
  • 10:Favorite bands?

    Of all time? Pink Floyd, Radiohead, Kate Bush. Used to love Talking Heads. I don't have the connections to any new music that I would like.
  • 11:Something you miss?

    My health, hope about the future, having a place of my own.
  • 12:Favorite song?

    "Sensual world" if i'm being touched by a woman.

    Right this second?

    Placebo - Protect Me From What I Want

  • 13:How old are you?

    Older than ashes.
  • 14:Zodiac sign?

    All of them.
  • 15:Hair Color?

    Going gray and white.
  • 16:Favorite Quote?

    "All animals are equal - but some are more equal than others".
  • 17:Favorite singer?
    Kate Bush overall
  • 18:Favorite color?

    Visible ones. The UV spectrum is all kinds of off.
  • 19:Loud music or soft?

    Mostly soft, although variation is important. The current fad of dynamic compression is awful.
  • 20:Where do you go when you're sad?

    Inside myself.
  • 21:How long does it take you to shower?

    Ages. Ideally i brush teeth and shave as well as everything else.
  • 22:How long does it take you to get ready in the morning?

    About 1 hr, 30 mins if i push it.
  • 23:Ever been in a physical fight?

    Yes, mostly one sided and not of my choosing.
  • 24:Turn on?

    So many! My kink list is enormous.
  • 25:Turn off?

    Receiving pain/humiliation. I'm hypersensitive to that now.
  • 26:The reason I joined Tumblr?

  • 27:Fears?

    Cancer (already had a close run); homelessness, especially as the gov't /opposition are united in cutting services to the poor and I'm disabled; not being able to find love.
  • 28:Last thing that made you cry?

    Properly? My father's death. It was prolonged and cruel.
  • 29:Last time you cried?

    I was 23?
  • 30:Meaning behind your url

  • 31:Last book you read?

    Some trashy science fiction novel. I have to give up on paper books now, I can't carry them about as I move and it looks like I'll be moving a lot. The flood destroyed a lot of them in any case.

  • 32:Last song you listened to?

    Placebo - I'll Be Yours

  • 33:Last show you watched?

    Some documentary on aircraft accidents. Apparently the effect of automation has been that pilots are now falling asleep and zoning out from boredom, and not really learning how to fly - and when things go wrong, they will go very very wrong.
  • 37:Place you want to visit?

    Realistic or unrealistic?

    Unrealistic. The pyramids, before the vandals destroy them.

    Realistic. Circular Queue.
  • 38:Last place you were?

    I am.
  • 39:Do you have a crush?

  • 40:Last time you kissed someone?

    Maybe ten years ago now? She was not a nice person - but oh! she was pretty. I kept thinking I could break through to her, but no; her problems were too deep.
  • 41:Last time you were insulted and what was it?

    Oh i get insults on twitter etc all the time. Some feminist said all men were subhuman; i'm going to take that personally, every time.
  • 46:Last sport you played?

    That I remember? Tennis. I have medical problems that make all such activities beyond me, but if I could play it would be tennis or soccer.
  • 50:Favorite movie?

    Right now? Hmm. I liked "The Avengers"

Medicinal cannabis an option: minister
We don't have separate trials here for every new medication. We rely on the US results. Why do we need new trials here for cannabis?

"It has to be tested, trialled, to be proven safe"

Done decades ago. Nixon investigated, it was cleared, he decided to ignore the findings. She's stalling for time.

une 2, 1971, Time:  3:16 pm - 4:15 pm -- Oval Office Conv. 510-3 
-- Nixon met with John Ehrlichman

RN: "Why in the name of God do these people take this stuff?"

JE: "For the same reason they drink. It's a, they're bored, it's 
a, it's a diversion."

RN: "Drinking is a different thing in a sense. Uh, Linkletter's 
point I think is well taken, he says, 'A person may drink to have 
a good time' -"

JE: "Mm-hmm"

RN: "-- but a person does not drink simply for the purpose of 
getting high. You take drugs for the purpose of getting high." 

[editor's note: Bullshit!]

JE: "Yep, yep."

RN: "There is a difference."
According to oval office tapes declassified in 2002, Nixon told Shafer he wanted a report that would blur the distinction between marijuana and hard drugs. The tapes reveal that as the commission was beginning its investigation in May, 1971, Nixon told his aide H.R. 
Haldeman, “I want a goddamn strong statement about marijuana. Can I get that out of this sonofa-bitching, uh, domestic council? I mean one on marijuana that just tears the ass out of them.”

Two weeks later Nixon saw something in his news summary that inspired him to tell Haldeman, “Every one of the bastards that are out for legalizing marijuana is Jewish. What the Christ is the matter with the Jews, Bob, what is the matter with them? I suppose it’s because most of them are psychiatrists, you know, there’s so many, all the greatest psychiatrists are Jewish. By god, we are going to hit the marijuana thing, and I want to hit it right square in the puss. I want to find a way of putting more on that.”

[Editor's note: So if they'd been Catholic, Cannabis would be legal? Nixon was just a bigot looking for excuses to maintain the status quo]

"Shafer brought his report to the White House March 21, 1972. It called for a policy “which prohibits commercial distribution of the drug but does not apply criminal sanctions to private possession or use nor casual, non-profit distribution incidental to use.” This approach was soon dubbed “decriminalization.”

The Commission’s major findings, as culled by Doug McVay of Common Sense for Drug Policy:
“No significant physical, biochemical, or mental abnormalities could be attributed solely to their marihuana smoking... No valid stereotype of a marihuana user or non-user can be drawn...

Young people who choose to experiment with marihuana are fundamentally the same people, socially and psychologically, as those who use alcohol and tobacco... No verification is found of a causal relationship between marihuana use and subsequent heroin use.... Most users, young and old, demonstrate an average or above-average degree of social functioning, academic achievement, and job performance...

“The weight of the evidence is that marihuana does not cause violent or aggressive behavior; if anything marihuana serves to inhibit the expression of such behavior... Marihuana is not generally viewed by participants in the criminal justice community as a major contributing influence in the commission of delinquent or criminal acts...

Neither the marihuana user nor the drug itself can be said to constitute a danger to public safety...

Research has not yet proven that marihuana use significantly impairs driving ability or performance1

“No reliable evidence exists indicating that marihuana causes genetic defects in man... Marihuana’s relative potential for harm to the vast majority of individual users and its actual impact on society does not justify a social policy designed to seek out and firmly punish those who use it.”"

And almost every medication imaginable is dangerous. You think codeine or aspirin are safe?

"We have to make sure substances are clinically effective."

Done. The US already did all this. We've had cases of incurably ill patients recovering when they use it - and degenerating again when it's denied them.

This is insane. They have been "just about to try it" for decades. How long can they drag their feet on this?

For example:

1. On Mar. 21, 2014, Utah Governor Gary Herbert signed HB 105 (80 KB), known as "Charlee's Law," which allows the use and possession of marijuana extract, under certain conditions, by people with intractable epilepsy who have a statement signed by a neurologist.

The extract must be composed of less than 0.3% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and at least 15% cannabidiol (CBD) by weight, and may not contain any other psychoactive substance.

The law goes into effect on July 1, 2014. The extract must be obtained in a sealed container from a laboratory that is licensed in the state where it was produced, with a label stating the extract's ingredients and origin, and transmitted by the laboratory to the Utah Department of Health. The Utah Department of Health is required to determine the details of the registration program.

Cannabis saves lives. This is not in dispute in the scientific community. It is kept illegal for political reasons only.

"Dronabinol and nabilone are indicated for the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy and of anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

However, pain and muscle spasms are the most common reasons that medical cannabis is being recommended. Studies of medical cannabis show significant improvement in various types of pain and muscle spasticity. Reported adverse effects are typically not serious, with the most common being dizziness. "

As a chronic pain sufferer, I've had to go for about a decade, slowly getting worse, being signed up to trials that are aborted at the last minute. I don't trust these governments any more. They will always try to find a way out from proceeding.

I can speculate as to why. I can guess that it would hurt the bottom line for too many companies, or that religious zealots have too much influence over them, or that they are genuinely bamboozled by vested interests.

But it's just speculation. And meanwhile, all around me, I see people withering and in pain, and for no other reason than the government talking about action on this issue - but never quite doing anything.

 "Spasticity, central pain syndromes and bladder dysfunction (disorders not including Parkinson’s disease) seemed to be improved with marijuana use.

39 patients (45.9%) described mild or substantial alleviation of their PD symptoms in general, 26 (30.6%) showed improvement of rest tremor, 38 (44.7%) had improvement in bradykinesia, 32 (37.7%) had alleviation of muscle rigidity, and 12 (14.1%) had improvement of L-dopa-induced dyskinesias. 

Only 4 patients in this survey (4.7%) reported that cannabis actually worsened their symptoms. Patients using cannabis for at least 3 months reported significantly more alleviation of their Parkinson’s disease symptoms in general"

You know what? If we had never discovered cannabis before, and found it could do this, we would use it as medicine, no question, because whatever the downside, the benefits are enormous.

" the safety margin of recreational substances as normally used is: 6 for heroin; 10 for alcohol; 15 for cocaine; 16 for MDMA; 20 for codeine; and 1,000 for LSD or marijuana."
This is from

Compared to other over-the-counter drugs, acetaminophen (aka paracetamol) has a relatively narrow safety margin—that is, the difference between a safe-but-effective dose and an overdose is relatively small. Doctors have reported liver failure from as little as 2.5 grams in a day, which is 1.5 grams less than the approved limit.


Surprisingly, given the alarming results of cognitive studies, most marijuana-intoxicated drivers show only modest impairments on actual road tests.37, 38 Experienced smokers who drive on a set course show almost no functional impairment under the influence of marijuana, except when it is combined with alcohol.39

Thursday, 21 May 2015

What if a "mattress girl" targets me next?

Reblogged from: I don't need Feminism, Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 13:53
Author: --Jonathan

The more I hear about this college and this young woman, the more I am sickened and terrified of attending a U.S. college. It just seems like more and more colleges and universities are kowtowing to the constraints of theoretical-idealist/liberal ideology.

First, this lady claims another student raped her. Then private messages she sent to the student very soon after she had claimed the rape occurred are exposed, showing how much she herself was pining after this student and how much she herself seemed to desire a sexual relationship. So she retracts her accusation, and both the college and law enforcement clear the student of any charges.

But she didn't stop.

For the next two years, she continued to play the victim, creating a melodrama so narcissistically over-inflated that the college, to many onlookers nationwide, has become a laughingstock.

The formerly accused student was subjected to humiliation and mass public shaming reminiscent of a witch-hunt. And the college has continued to make exceptions to their rules for this dishonest, self-absorbed lady, such as allowing her to exhibit her graphic drawings she had made of her supposed "rapist" on campus.

This narcissist is not a victim and certainly not a heroine of gender equality. She herself has victimized the male student and indirectly slapped the faces of other young men (who are made that much more demonized and under suspicion of violent/sexual crime) and of actual rape victims (who are made that much less credible in the eyes of our judicial system and the public at large). Absolutely disgusting.

It just has me worried.

Not about women, because it's not women that are the problem.

It's our culture at large, and specifically campus culture. There are manipulative, dishonest members of both genders, but what if a manipulative woman such as "mattress girl" decides to go after me in the same way?

Will my college step in and make sure she isn't given such a pedestal from which to slander me and encourage the public shaming and slander of me?

Or will they give her ridiculous leniency, allowing her handouts and exceptions from rules so that she can continue to make my life hell?

I want to trust my school, because I can't imagine its authorities not doing anything to punish a student like "mattress girl," but can I know for sure?

Editor's note:

Do rape victims send their rapists messages requesting a repeat performance? 

Why did the university take her seriously after this was revealed to them?

Could it be they Listen and Believe any woman who accuses any man? archived from

On Aug. 29, two days after the alleged rape, Nungesser messaged Sulkowicz on Facebook to say, “Small shindig in our room tonight—bring cool freshmen.” Her response:

lol yusss
Also I feel like we need to have some real time where we can talk about life and thingz
because we still haven’t really had a paul-emma chill sesh since summmmerrrr
On Sept. 9, on a morning before an ADP meeting, it was Sulkowicz who initiated the Facebook contact, asking Nungesser if he wanted to “hang out a little bit” before or after the meeting and concluding with:

whatever I want to see yoyououoyou
respond—I’ll get the message on ma phone

On Oct. 3, Sulkowicz’s birthday, Nungesser sent her an effusive greeting; she responded the next morning with  “I love you Paul. Where are you?!?!?!?!”

What would the Nazis have said about the rights of Jews?

Ask yourselves: what would the Nazis have said about the rights of Jews? The disabled? The gypsies, the communists, the dissidents?
This is incredibly popular amongst Feminists. They see men as less than dirt.
As nothing.
And the sad thing is - men end up believing it too.

Tuesday, 19 May 2015

Feminists hate being called fascists

... but don't seem to mind being fascists.

This was sent to me in response to

“like i literally just asked you if you related to completely unrelated topics“

No, you literally did no such thing.

“you called me fascist? do you even know what that word means?”

Gosh. I wonder.

“   :  a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality  — J. W. Aldridge> “

And do feminists tend to totalitarian controls?

They censor art. BG-Cv41-Joker-variant-solicitation

They burn books

They attack people who express opinions different to their own.

Feminism is hate
“I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” – Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor; “I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” – Andrea Dworkin; “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” – Sally Miller Gearhart

You don't think Orwell would find any of this familiar? He went to war to fight against people like that. He put his life on the line, and spent even his dying days fighting your kind.

You don't like being called a fascist? Yet you are happy to belong to a hate cult that describes people as inferior based on a genetic difference.


Friday, 15 May 2015

And today’s crush is...

These two ladies. I would love to travel with to Mars (and back), bonking all the way!

How adorable is that?


Would prefer vinyl or leather, but that works pretty well. ;-)

You lucky, lucky, bastard. ;-)

Woo, maybe she could teach me camera stuffs...

Yay, coffee! Shared interests!

Moar shared interests! We should mate.

Ok, looks like she’s ready for me; gotta go!

Wednesday, 13 May 2015

My slave refused an order? Time to kill!

She said she was frustrated that her husband wasn't helping her clean up spilled water. She admitted she "blew up" and that she pointed the gun at her husband's chest and pulling the trigger. ...she "wanted him to pay," according to police.

She "doesn't think she did anything wrong and she was well within her rights because of how (her husband) was reacting and she was so pissed off".

Can you imagine the shitstorm from feminists if the genders were reversed? Of course, they don't care about this; according to the Duluth Model, men are responsible for ALL domestic violence, so he deserved it, that bastard!

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

Won’t somebody please think of the children?

There was a time when Feminists believed in sexual liberation. They saw that as empowering, and fought for the right to be free sexually as in other ways.

They saw censoring everything in case children saw it as wrong - why should you see sex as being shameful? Why should you try and pretend adults do not do these things?
This was the stance of their opponents - the uptight, the puritannical, the fanatical.

So what happens when some company puts up some jokes about sex?

Modern Feminists go mental. They claim these jokes promote sexism and ‘rape culture'.

I don’t see any discrimination on the basis of sex here. If anything, they are scrupulously fair and not at all heteronormative!

I think modern feminists think sexuality...  means... sexism!

“ Using a naked women”


Ok, first off, they aren’t naked, and they are certainly more covered up than other feminists have been!

So they are back to the mindset of those shrill 1950s matrons. They’ll be telling the young gals to keep a penny between the knees next!

And where’s the bleedin’ rape? A joke about having sex for money equals rape? Is that how rape works? If a woman is selling her body for money, a man fucks her, and pays accordingly, is that magically rape now?

What am I saying? Of course it is!

Feminism. It has no consistent views except that everyone else is wrong.

Monday, 11 May 2015

Joss Whedon’s problematic writing choices

Criticizing Joss Whedon’s problematic writing choices does not translate to hate."

Use of the word problematic almost guarantees manipulative language.

"Also, word of advice, if you want people to stop accusing you of being racist or sexist"

...move to another planet because Feminist use those words as a way of controlling people.
"then you might want to stay away from the following:

Having the lead female protagonist of your show almost raped by her love interest and then have the showrunner praise the rapist as being his favorite character and having the best character development (Spike, Buffy the Vampire Slayer)"

She raped him right back. They were both pretty twisted, but he had the excuse of being a soulless monster. He lived in a world of rape and murder and was surprised to find he didn't want that any more.

Real people are messy. Only feminists and other fanatics don't want characters that are like real people.

"Plan to have a prostitute gang raped to feed into the character development of her male love interest (Inara, Firefly)"Heaven forbid something bad would happen in a show that happens in real life. All the female characters must stay safe at all times. No adventures. No fun. Grey walls. No sounds. Feminism.

"Have a show that heavily features Asian culture and religions, but then fail to cast any Asian actors (Firefly)"

Like the way we have heavily Roman influenced western cultures without Italians? The world: how does it work?

"Claim that having Asian actors was unnecessary because one of your white actors “kind of looked Asian.” (Summer Glau, Firefly)"

A quote without references. Typical SJW bullshit.

"Fire your lead actress for getting pregnant and then spend the next season shitting all over her character (Charisma Carpenter, Angel)"

Again, no references, just an opinion. Dismissed as more bullcrap.

"Inviting that lead actress to come back to the show, promising her that she’ll stick around until the final episode, only to turn around and kill her character off at the last moment as revenge (Charisma Carpenter, Angel)"

Soooo, you've never heard of this thing called 'evidence', then, have you? No?

"Creating the single most racist depiction of a black female character by making her violent, savage, animalistic and so dumb that she isn’t even able to speak"

You realise she was supposed to be some protohuman? But they couldn't portray one so they took a human and slapped make-up on her?

"these incredible supernatural powers came with a terrible price: she lost her humanity forever. "

" then reveal that the way she became the first slayer, was by having a group of old men force a demon into her body without her consent (The First Slayer, Buffy the Vampire Slayer)"

Gosh. People - living in an era when cannibalism was normal, when rape was normal, in a story where monsters ruled the land and humans were in danger of extinction - disregarded her consent. Oh no. Heavens to Betsy.

You do realise that if a Dam engineer has to pull a lever to murder hundreds of people, in order to save thousands from a flood, that's what they do? That's a real world, mundane ethical decision?

Fuck. Feminists are fucking useless, seriously, I can just imagine them trying to get a consensus decision while a time bomb was ticking next to them... "is it RIGHT to cut the red wire, or are we dishonouring the memory of those Native Americans who died horribly so long ago? Should we cut the white wire instead, even if it isn't the one the Patriarchy says will save us?"


"Have one of the most popular female superheroes referred to as a “cunt” by the main villain (Natasha Romanoff, Avengers)"

Oh no! A villain did something bad! How shocking. I don't care if this one is real, what the fuck, I say, what the fuck do you expect a VILLAIN to do? Be considerate of preferred pronouns?

Jesus Bloody Christ.

"Claim that because a female character was unable to have children, that she was considered a monster (Natasha Romanoff, Avengers: Age of Ultron)"

You pulled that nugget out of your arse. Look, those who saw the movie know you are trying to spin your butt-baby into gold, but it ain't going to fly. She was a monster because she killed people. It was shown on screen. Guy in the hood, defenceless, strapped to a chair. She was a child murderer. That's the bit you cannot grasp.

The loss of her uterus was a source of pain, not shame.

"Taking one of the strongest female superheroes in the MCU and turning her into an outlet for her male love interest to pour his man angst "

Oh, the bigotry just pours out of you doesn't it. Just like a fucking Nazi would talk about "jew pain". A man can't just feel pain in your mind - you specify it as man pain, because who gives a shit if men are in pain?

You can't bear to treat a man as an equal.

Bruce and Natasha shared intimacy. That means sharing pain. Sharing vulnerability. That must piss you off so much - the idea your 'strong' woman might treat a man as a human being.

" completely dump her in the end without any expression of gratitude for all she did for him (Natasha Romanoff, Avengers: Age of Ultron)"

He put her needs ahead of his own. He sacrificed his happiness to make sure she was safe. Only a feminist can look at that and decide he's still - SOMEHOW - victimising her!

"Have one of the most popular superheroes in the MCU joke about raping women (Tony Stark, Avengers: Age of Ultron)"

In such an absurd way that no-one but a feminist could take it seriously - just like when they joked about Hawkeye being impotent.

"Feature two characters who were originally of Jewish-Romani descent and then have them whitewashed by hiring white actors to play them (Wanda Maximoff and Pietro Maximoff, Avengers: Age of Ultron)"

You have no idea how much you sound like a neo-nazi. I'm not aware of any other group that thinks Jews can't be white.

These are how they have been depicted by Marvel.

Having two Jewish-Romani characters volunteer for a Nazi organization"

You never actually watched the movies, did you?

"Have the audacity to redefine feminism and re-brand it because he found feminism distasteful."

More butt nuggets.

"Constantly using the “break the cutie” trope to punish his supposedly “strong female characters.” (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly, Avengers: Age of Ultron)"

Which he does to male characters too.

"Using the threat of sexual violence against his lead female protagonists on multiple occasions (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly, Avengers)"

You claim this is what happens to women constantly in real life but can't bear to see it addressed in fiction? But you have no problems with murders, cannibalism, torture and genocide?
"Check yourself, fandom. "

Go fuck yourself, SJW.

"These criticisms of Joss Whedon’s work have been long-standing and are completely valid. "

Oh, I get it. You're 13. You're 13, and think if you say it's "completely valid" then you don't have to deal with anyone pointing out that it fucking well is not.

No, we will not shut up. You are a liar, a slanderer and a bigot. Let's face it - you suck!

"So, before you get on your high horse and try to accuse his detractors of being bitter fangirls"

Since you don't seem to have watched the things you are talking about, the term 'fan' should be removed.

"his detractors are bitter girls"

Yep, that's it. He creates, you can't, but oh god, you know how to whine.

"take a look at all the fucked up shit your problematic fav has said and done, and then we’ll talk"

Go fuck yourself with a spade. Then we'll talk. Just rinse that thing when you're done, I have gardening to do.