Monday, 19 October 2015

Feminist Professor claims equality is impossible, as all males are inferior

"Women are not equal to men; they are superior in many ways, and in most ways that will count in the future." webpage capture saved from     18 Oct 2015 23:50:54 UTC

This article reminds me of the old Nazi propaganda where they would go into endless detail as to why Aryans were superior to Jews.

Nothing of his claims makes any sense unless you start with the assumption of male inferiority. It is a circular argument.

"Why did those self-sufficient females invent males? "

This is pseudo-scientific gobbledigook. In an asexual species, they aren't female. The English language just don't have a decent word for a gender neutral being.
"There is a birth defect that is surprisingly common, affecting a key pair of chromosomes. In the normal condition the two look the same, but in this disorder one is shrunken beyond recognition. "

It's incredibly emotive to look at code samples and decide one set is 'shrunken'. Unless you can read and understand the code, you have no idea whether it is missing useful instructions - or the other version is simply full of junk.

Has this professor cracked the code? When every geneticist in the world cannot do so? I didn't think so.

As for male and female, it's only some species that use Y chromosomes for male anyway.

" The Z chromosome is larger and has more genes, like the X chromosome in the XY system."

By this 'logic', male birds are innately superior because the sex chromosome is larger.

Not sure how he deals with those species that change sex depending on temperature or other circumstances - I guess they just meditate on their loathing until they can find some way to twist the facts to their idiotic ideology.

" The majority of young people now graduating from high school, entering college, and finishing college are female"

Yes, and when the reverse was true it was used as proof that the system was sexist. Special female only scholarships were created, and the teaching styles were changed to be female focussed.

Male education has tanked in feminist countries, but it does very well elsewhere. Does that mean there are different species of humans? Are Asian Males innately superior to African American Males? Gasp! 
Of course, the author has no problem with discrimination against the group they loathe. It's not sexist when their side does it. "It doesn't count when we do it" is the catch phrase of bigots everywhere.

"Contrary to all received wisdom, women are more logical and less emotional than men."

Hmm, well if it's contrary to all received wisdom, there'll be some mighty great evidence needed.

(*looks for evidence*)

No evidence here. It's blindly asserted. It's precisely as true as saying that "Jews are subhuman".

"Women do cry more easily, and that, too, is partly biological. "

No, it's wholely biological. Male tear ducts operate differently.
Women are biologically wired to shed tears more than men. Under a microscope, cells of female tear glands look different than men's. Also, the male tear duct is larger than the female's, so if a man and a woman both tear up, the woman's tears will spill onto her cheeks quicker. "For men and their ducts, it'd be like having a big fat pipe to drain in a rainstorm," says Louann Brizendine, a neuropsychiatrist at the University of California, San Francisco.
"But life on this planet isn’t threatened by women’s tears"

It's not threatened by anything human at all. Even a nuclear war would, at worst, wipe us out, but, mostly, life would barely notice it.

Meanwhile, it's humans - especially males - who are heading into space to try and spread life elsewhere, so it isn't wiped out by a single bloody asteroid.
" nor does that brimming salty fluid cause poverty"

You really are obsessed with tears. Where is your proof that masculinity causes poverty? Human productivity has increased year after year under what you regard as a male dominated society. There is less starvation in relative terms than ever before. In many countries, the poor have clean water, full bellies, usually a roof over their heads.

So are female societies more productive? Where are these bastions of wealth, then?

" ruin reputations"

You seriously propose that women do not do that? Fu.... do you you even know a woman is?

" impose forced intimacies"

Amazing. You don't know that women can rape? You never asked? Did a search on the internet? Did any research at all?

Nope. It must be true because a Feminist said it was.

Female rape victim who was attacked by another woman shares details about the 'terrifying' assault and reveals friends and family 'dismissed it as a lesbian experiment gone wrong' 
  • The victim was cornered in a bathroom at a party and had her underwear forcibly removed while her mouth and nose were covered
  • She said that no one at the party ever spoke about the incident again - and even her therapist seemed 'unimpressed' by her experience
  • Having been assaulted by both a man and a woman, the victim said that both were 'equally terrifying' - but only one garnered real sympathy

19 Men Share Stories of Being Raped By A Woman

And so on...

"slay children"

Women are the primary source of violence to children.

Eight children aged between 2 and 14 stabbed - four boys and four girls. Raina Thaiday, mother of seven of the children and an aunt of one, charged with murder.

Detroit mom who killed her two children and put them in a freezer sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole

"torture helpless people"

"... or reduce cities to rubble"
Because female leaders have never existed? They never conducted wars? Does this professor even know what a history book is?

Recent historians, however, have taken a more complicated view of Elizabeth.[195] Her reign is famous for the defeat of the Armada, and for successful raids against the Spanish, such as those on Cádiz in 1587 and 1596, but some historians point to military failures on land and at sea.[125]

In Ireland, Elizabeth's forces ultimately prevailed, but their tactics stain her record.[196]

Queen Anne's War
(1702–1713), as the North American theater of the War of the Spanish Succession was known in the British colonies, was the second in a series of French and Indian Wars fought between France and England, later Great Britain,[1] in North America for control of the continent. The War of the Spanish Succession was primarily fought in Europe. In addition to the two main combatants, the war also involved numerous Native American tribes allied with each nation, and Spain, which was allied with France. It was also known as the Third Indian War[3] or in French as the Second Intercontinental War.[4]'s_War

"These disasters are literally man-made. They result from men’s emotions, which are a constant distraction to them."

The Most Terrifying Female Rulers in History

Every point this twat makes is testable. Yet they don't even spend a few seconds of searching to check. I think this is completely a matter of projection - a spittle-drenched rant of bile, emotion the only source, reason the direst enemy.

See Also:

This Week in Stupid (18/10/2015) bySargon of Akkad Sargon of Akkad

Start at 16:55 for commentary on the same article. As always, Sargon manages to brilliantly summarise the idiocy of these ideologues.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please try to avoid logical fallacies!