Wednesday, 25 July 2018

Feminists demand males be declared rapists in Australia

Why do Feminists hate men, and why do men put up with that hate?

Archived from

25 Jul 2018 05:35:12 UTC

““If it’s not an enthusiastic yes, then it’s a no,” Ms Goward said in May.”

In almost all of my sexual experiences, my partners haven’t verbally asked me for consent. It isn’t dreamt of in Pru Goward’s mindset that a woman should have to do this of a man, and I have to say that this would be a very effective method of birth control.

 If someone is my partner, they have consent until I say no, and if I can’t trust my partner to reciprocate, then I see no point in relationships. Why should I live with a gun to my head, under laws that give women the freedom to kill me at a whim?

Plus, how do you prove you have you have verbal consent? Would voice recordings be enough? What if you have sex several times in a row, do you need a different record of each encounter? What about changing position? Changing rhythm? Does it need to be renewed every three minutes? Thirty seconds?
  1. Do you consent?
  2. Do you consent?
  3. Do you consent?
  4. Do you consent?
  5. Do you consent?

Say they said yes loudly in steps1-3, and 5, but 4 was soft. Would Ms Goward seize about that as evidence of sexcrime?

In sex, people are often kissing, or using mouths in other ways. Some people are very nonverbal, but according to Goward, if a female pulls a male to the bed, takes off his clothes, and then hers, then jumps on him… he has raped her, because he did not ask her VERBAL consent.

Feminists love to change the law to criminalise sexuality, but it is always selectively enforced on a sexist basis. Men are rapists. Women are their victims. They can’t imagine any other way for it to be.

No wonder they want sex work and sexbots banned. Whatever will they do if men have alternatives to living with a gun to their heads?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please try to avoid logical fallacies!