Saturday, 22 September 2018

Is asking actors to ACT a hatecrime?

https://flashbak.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1977-1st-issue.jpg
Her introduction was as Ms Marvel as
Captain Marvel was an existing character.

http://www.openlettersmonthly.com/issue/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/starlin-captain-marvel.jpg

multirpuniverse commented on appreciation-post's photo ““Captain Marvel should smile more” “she looks so serious all the...”
“Smile more.” I love that Brie shot back at this!!! Wonder Woman did not smile in her poster! Why should Captain Marvel? Why should Black Widow? Why should Scarlet Witch and all the other women in movies “smile more”? To do what exactly? Make them look more fuckable? Relieve your misogynistic thoughts and do whatever the hell you want with them? Nuh uh!!! This is the 21st century! Wake up and keep your hands and your dicks to yourselves!!!
I was going to say feminists were insane but inane is more the case.



adj.        One that lacks sense or substance:  interrupting with inane comments; angry with my inane roommate.    


“Smile more”, goes their strawman. It doesn’t matter that it’s been debunked, they know it’s debunked. Feminists love to lie, and every repetition of the lie is like a little orgasm for them.


“ I love that Brie shot back at this!!!”

So the customers pointed out she shows nothing but resting bitch face, and she ... attacks her own customer base?



Man. This is going to be the ghostbusters reboot all over again.



“ Why should Scarlet Witch and all the other women in movies “smile more”? “

a) Every male character does.


https://cdn.flutter.co/pulse/uploads/PlqT63pgT7fGVwpDnECP_Doctor_Strange_shoot_images.png


image



image
image
image
image
image

b) It makes a character relatable that at least somewhere in their lives they aren’t just looking vaguely annoyed.

c) ANY OTHER EMOTION WOULD ALSO HAVE BEEN GOOD.

“ To do what exactly? Make them look more fuckable?

https://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/gammasquadhayleyatwellboob.jpg?quality=80&w=650
It is perfectly cromulent to have scenes in a movie that are there to appeal to female sexuality...

Umm, you do realise women are also attracted to women? Why do you hate lesbians?

“ Relieve your misogynistic thoughts “

You first. You are the one who can’t stand women being treated like men are. You do not respect women, you either want them in a pedestal or surrounded by cushions. Go fuck yourself.

“ This is the 21st century! “

This is what a Feminist thinks is an argument.

http://www.kimia.ca/aztecs_stone_calendar_files/image002.jpg

“ keep your hands and your dicks to yourselves!!! “

Yep. Feminists think asking an actor to act in a movie is the same as raping them.


Feminists hate smiling, except at male suicide, of course. Everything decent about them has long died, and they can’t comprehend human emotions any more.

No wonder they find the suggestion that Brie show anything but resting bitch face to be infuriating!

Maybe she just can’t. Maybe that’s all she has left?





 









image
As has been pointed out many times, Jude Law shows more emotion in two seconds
THAN EVERY SCENE OF BRIE IN THE TRAILER.
Captain Marvel - formerly Ms Marvel - used to have emotions.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yWvqfx03yQo/T19fegM4oUI/AAAAAAAAHFQ/CufVFQnXXWc/s1600/ms-marvel.jpg
determination



https://marvelitesxmen.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/seds.jpg
fury



https://flashbak.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/ms-marvel-costume.jpg
self confidence



pain





https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111115588/3264488-ms.marvel+7.jpg




http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/6/61625/3232424-3129643627-tumbl.jpg
She could even... smile!


In the comics, Rogue and Ms Marvel battled, and Rogue drained her powers for years...




Wednesday, 12 September 2018

Feminists push more wage gap victimhood


Because of the way they set up the 'meme', it's unreadable unless I make the pic huge - and no, they don't link to an archive or anything you can use to see if any of this actually happened.

So 4 randos who nobody cared about - have a look at the number of likes their comments got - are the proof there’s a hostile environment for women in tech?

This the level of proof required for feminists. Hell, those accounts could have been created by feminists for this ‘gotcha’.

Here’s an idea - maybe the reason that women and men, on the whole, do different jobs when they have a choice is… men and women are DIFFERENT.

Study finds some significant differences in brains of men and women

A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure


Study finds differences in male, female brain activity when it comes to cooperation

Male and female brain rhythms show differences


So here's a thought; why is it female feminists are unable to create their own coding houses? Why are feminist computer games appalling? 

And why can't they work from home in any case? Hell, there are Indians writing code for American offices - they don't fly over, they use funky technology called "the internet" to shift code from one spot to another.

And what's one of the things they do? They make mobile apps. Like the model. The one who claims that the environment is hostile.

How do you find it hostile when you can work anywhere you damned well please?

https://betanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/student-coffee-cafe-laptop-woman-e1441972124681.jpg

A feminists able to find victimhood without ever experiencing it? Gosh, how shocking!!

See also:



How feminists misrepresent the gender ‘wage gap’

Tuesday, 4 September 2018

Are the changes in asphyxiation laws a Trojan Horse?

This is from the ABC Australia, and of course it works from the Duluth Model - all domestic violence is described using the paradigm of male abuser - female "damsel in distress"

http://www.femdom-resource.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Breathplay.jpg


Choking, non-fatal strangulation offences already in Queensland the focus of new push for WA

Archived: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-23/non-fatal-strangulation-offences-focus-of-new-push-in-wa/10023184 4

Sep 2018 13:22:05 UTC



Now the law is especially focusing on those who use strangulation to any degree. I would have that the assault laws would already cover it, but they are being specific.


Why, I have to wonder? What has changed?


Well one thing that has changed is that a lot of women enjoy erotic strangulation (breathplay). This puts men in an interesting situation where they can be arrested for doing ... precisely what their partner demands they do!



Unfortunately, Domestic Violence organisations are largely run by and for feminists. Have a look at each story on this web page, notice the pattern?


Males are the enemy.


Females are the victim.


There are no gays or lesbians - despite lesbian DV being the highest and gay DV being the lowest.


"The Western Australian Council for Domestic and Family Violence Services, the peak body representing women's refuges in WA"



Women's refuges. Not men's. A body to cover ALL domestic violence victims only cares about female victims of men. There are no refuges for men. There is certainly no acknowledgement that strangulation can be consensual.

  • Women's Crisis Line: 1800 811 811
  • Men's Referral Service: 1300 766 491
Wow! A men's referral service! Surely that would be where men could get help?

Wah wah!! It's " for men who are wanting to stop their violent or abusive behaviour towards their family members"

(Archived:

http://www.dvrcv.org.au/no-to-violence
4 Sep 2018 13:38:38 UTC)


I have to wonder if that means a man can be charged over the wishes of his wife? The poor dear must have internalised misogyny - she can't possibly enjoy such things - she really needs to turn to the light and embrace OUR faith ...


Also - what about auto-erotic asphyxiation? Will men be arrested for masturbation? But that would mean men could be domestic violence victims ... of themselves!


Male victimiser = true but male victim = impossible! (Feminist head explodes)

Note: I am not advocating breathplay. My personal opinion is that it is just too dangerous. But to refuse to even acknowledge women could desire it, and to make up a law that would prosecute any male that agrees to it - that seems to be corruption at work.

We do not criminalise dangerous practices or we would outlaw mountain climbing and diving the oceans. We let adults make choices.

"The Personal is Political" is a Feminist slogan. So too is "Get the Hell out of our Bedrooms". I just wish they would make up their minds.

Further Reading:



Take My Breath Away | A Breathplay Guide

Ask Anything: Can Breath Play Be Safe?

Monday, 3 September 2018

Mother teaches boy to hate himself - in the name of feminism, naturally!

"boys supported from an early age that “girls can do anything”"

Well, we would have boys taught to loathe themselves, because they know boys can't "do anything". So I have to wonder what mother would think that that was a good idea?


Lemme guess - you followed it up with screaming "The Future is Female" at him until he agreed to do the surgery?

 Perhaps it's not too late to put the poor bastard up for adoption. Jes' sayin'. We get it, you hate all males, but surely pushing that one into suicide might be a little too far, even for you?

http://archive.is/Mg43G

Archived: https://www.facebook.com/ThisSoCalledMom/posts/1739386152826881?__tn__=C-R
3 Sep 2018 13:16:24 UTC

Saturday, 1 September 2018

Why I think sex is binary in humans



In context, I had my Facebook account suspended for saying that humans have two sexes. I received a message that that was now considered hatespeech, and my account was locked.

In Australia, hatespeech is a serious crime. Worldwide, we have seen those accused of it locked out of social media, their videos demonetised or even removed - thus destroying people's livelihoods. And we have seen the biggest social media platforms marching in lockstep, purging those deemed hatespeakers even when they can find no law or even rule that they broke.

I must dissent.

16h16 hours ago

for those unclear on my thoughts about bio sex, i have long described sex as a spectrum, not binary. the spectrum has a bimodal distribution (which is a spectrum with 2 peaks). the peaks in the spectrum arise from two competing networks of gene activity (aka "male" and "female").
Replying to

What mystifies me is the degree to which some people exhibit such a violent rejection of non-binary gender, as if the mere concept were some sort of existential threat to them. Why so much fear and anger over this?



http://archive.is/bMDq6

Archived from https://twitter.com/gogreen18/status/1035601503996731392

1 Sep 2018 11:06:32 UTC

My response?

To me, this is much like the arguments I used to have with creationists. They depended on the fact that the models we use do not cover everything perfectly. They depended on the popular misconception that they needed to!

The fact is, all scientific models are imperfect. Science is an attempt to use models of reality, while acknowledging that reality itself may be unknowable. You simply try to create one that fits the facts as best as possible, and that has some predictive value. You keep that model until you can find a better one. It can be emotionally difficult to discard the old model, but it is necessary to do so for science to progress.



If you say the current model of male and female is incorrect, but have nothing more accurate to replace it with, then you are expressing a matter of faith, not science.

You are worshiping the God of the Gaps.



"Men think epilepsy divine, merely because they do not understand it. We will one day understand what causes it, and then cease to call it divine. And so it is with everything in the universe."
- Hippocrates (c. 460-377 BCE

Quote Sources: Cosmos


So why so much fear and anger, when charlatans and fanatics try to spread this dogma?

Because force is used against those who don't agree with their faith. Because instead of logic & science, we have Feelz.

You feel the model is wrong? Very well. Find one with better predictive power. Because I think that a male pig & a female pig are necessary for a piglet.

Every. Damned. Time.

Sex, like species, is not a "social construct" as they would have us believe; as they demand we agree to or be silenced.




To claim that the boundaries over some areas are fuzzy therefore the entire model must be discarded is insanity. We know that a male cannot mate another male and produce offspring. As Monty Python pointed out,



Wanting something to be true will not make it true - in fact, a good scientist needs to be very much aware of the coldness of reality, that it is often exactly what we do not want it to be.

https://insideevs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/EV-train-1.jpg

If you stay on those tracks, all your wishing will not make that train brake any faster. By being aware of the reality, you are empowered. You have the choice to get off by simply moving to one side. It might be inconvenient. You might be comfortable sitting there. People have even decided to take a lovely nap right on that spot. But if you do not move in time, that train will end your life.

I've known train workers who had to deal with the consequences of drunks attempting a crossing - impaired by booze, they fail to grasp the reality of the situation in time.

I will spare you the details, and I strongly suggest you avoid the photos.



Why do I reference species? Because recently I have seen a push from Social Justice types to deny the existence of white people - to erase us from history, to claim that race is a social construct (and white people are evil!).

I have even seen them claim animal species do not exist, using boundary conditions of the model. For example, it is possible to successfully mate some species with somewhat viable offspring if they are very closely related. However, that is neither a way to disprove race nor species.

Unfortunately, Tumblr is a total mess when you try to export or archive it, so I cannot do justice to the argument on their side. However, if you watch the British BBC or the Australian ABC, it is impossible to avoid, as they are both effectively propaganda outlets for SocJus.

I am not sure how they can doublethink around the idea that white people don't exist AND they must be purged, but they sing songs about it on the taxpayer-funded ABC. I was involved in the complaints that eventually brought it down, but here is an excerpt from it.


Races exist.


We can predict what race someone is from bones, from genetic markers, from hair. The idea that the prediction must be perfect is bullshit; we use weather forecasts that are not, and cannot be perfect, and life and death decisions will be made with less than 100% certainty in all situations, because that is how reality works.

These morons want to make everything into a social construct, because they think confusing the matter will mean people will become pliable, easy to manipulate, willing to accept the emotive proposals they make rather than logic.

Yet science does not work that way. And all they can do is manage to get people killed if they succeed.

https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/ashkenazi-jewish-genetic-panel

“ About 85% of Jewish Americans have an Ashkenazi Jewish background. Their families came from Eastern or Central Europe. As many as 1 in 4 people in this group is a carrier of an AJ genetic disease. “

Whoops! Turns out reality doesn’t give a shit about post-modernist dogma. Knowing you are more probably going to have a genetic disease is better than not knowing, which is the only alternative they can offer.

https://www.webmd.com/hypertension-high-blood-pressure/features/why-7-deadly-diseases-strike-blacks-most

Yet more heresy!

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-01-genetic-variation-asian-susceptibility-kawasaki.html

Ermahgerd! Where does it end!

Maybe they will ban medicine as being Islamophobic or some bullshit. But meanwhile, back in sanity land, IT IS BETTER TO DEAL WITH THE FACTS THAN YOUR FEELS.


Forensics 101: Race Determination Based on the Skull

Because that is how you stop murderers. Not through mental tricks, word games, doublethink, but through the cold hard facts. Races exist, and knowing how to determine which one a corpse belongs to helps stop other people being turned into maggot-food. It is literally a matter of life and death.


It is the sort of brutal reality that is necessary to be able to prove a genocide took place in Rwanda. Something that cannot even exist in their minds.

They are just another breed of Holocaust-deniers.

Fuck Social Justice. It is anti-science, the anti-intellectualism of post-modernism blended with the worst of marxism to make a hellish brain-dead brew.

http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/
As for saying species don’t exist because there are some fuzzy boundaries in some cases - again, that is bullshit. Knowing whether some organisms are in the same species gives you information as to the genetic viability of cross-breeding.

Take an extreme example, where species are closely related:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_speciation

Tigers and lions are similar but different species, and whether the offspring can reproduce at all is greatly dependent on the combination of male and female (which SocJus thinks is a social construct!)


“ Likewise, lions and tigers have historically overlapped in a portion of their range and can theoretically produce wild hybrids: ligers, which are a cross between a male lion and female tiger, and tigons, which are a cross between a male tiger and a female lion; however, tigers and lions have thus far only hybridized in captivity.[12]

In both ligers and tigons, the females are fertile and the males are sterile.[12]


So sane people - who know sex and species are biological facts, not something that can alter depending on how people feel, can use that to predict what the outcome of a crossbreeding will be.

Science: Unless a male and a female mate, you will not get offspring.

SJW: How very dare you! We cannot predict whether or not someone is male of female from their body as sex is a social construct! It is impossible to know how pregnancies occur, or whether two people with penises will make a baby!

Science: It is incredibly unlikely for different species to produce offspring, and the only known examples of limited viability occur in closely related species.

SJW: “Species” is a social construct! Unless it perfectly predicts that no different species can interbreed, it must be ignored!

Which is bloody obvious, because otherwise donkeys would be crossbreeding with antelopes, and centaurs would be commonplace!




No, SocJus, no matter how you ahem that horse, this will not be the outcome.

Sex, and species, are hard facts. All the wanting wishy-washiness in the world won’t change them to meet your needs.