Tuesday, 26 November 2019

Feminist claim "The Future is Female" - but what does that mean?

The most popular Feminist slogan is a call to genocide.


Feminists cheer when they hear that men will be exterminated.

They want a future without us - but they lie, and say they want equality.

As for not having any rights until the 1960s, pfft.

Feminists don’t read history, they just listen and believe, and when another feminist says something insane, they just immediately class it as TRUTH, and there’s no second where a little voice in their head tells them to check the claim.

Kathleen Kennedy

Kathleen Kennedy remade Star Wars in a Feminist image, with the main character being a Mary Sue, and the white males being useless - or villains.

It flopped.

"The Mandalorian" was made in response to her failures, with a positive depiction of masculinity.

And Feminists are furious.


Liza Cowan

What Is Enlightenment (Susan Bridle):
Which brings us to another question I wanted to ask you. Sally Miller Gearhart, in her article “The Future If There Is One Is Female” writes:

“At least three further requirements supplement the strategies of environmentalists if we were to create and preserve a less violent world.

1) Every culture must begin to affirm the female future.

2) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture.

3) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately ten percent of the human race.”

What do you think about this statement?

Mary Daly: I
think it’s not a bad idea at all. If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males. People are afraid to say that kind of stuff anymore.

WIE: Yes. I find myself now thinking that’s a bit shocking.

: Well, it’s shocking that it would be shocking.

WIE: So it doesn’t sound like your vision of a separate nation for women is something you see as an interim stage that would eventually lead to men and women living together in true equality.

: No. That’s a very old question. I answered that to audiences twenty-five, thirty years ago. I just don’t think that way.

minists don’t want equality. They want murder.



By the way, i’ve noticed every website that includes the real meaning of “the future is female” gets shut down. Feminists are trying to erase the real meaning.

Why is that, I wonder?


ifeminists.com > introduction > editorials
Male-Bashing and a Foreboding of the Future
August 12, 2003
by Carey Roberts

When persons call for the decimation of half the world's population, that grabs my attention. This is what I'm talking about:
"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future--If There Is One--Is Female
"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." -- Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001
These proposals are disturbing in their own right. What is even more troubling is that no feminist has ever repudiated them.

When feminists call for global "decontamination" by phasing-out men, I can't help but think of the lies and accusations leveled against the Jews in Nazi Germany, and the similarities to contemporary gender feminism:

  1. Biological superiority: The National Socialists preached the genetic superiority of the Aryan race. Now, a feminist-oriented World Health Organization website claims that women enjoy an "inherent biological advantage."
  2. Sub-human: In the 1930s, the Jews were called vermin and "Judensau" (Jew-pig). Thirty years later, feminists referred to men as "male chauvinist pigs."
  3. Conspiracy theory: The Jews were often accused of "working together" to pollute German culture. Now, feminists refer to the so-called conspiracy against women as "the patriarchy."
  4. Excessive influence: Seventy years ago, Jews were accused of controlling the German economy. Now, men are accused of "having all the power."
  5. Threat to the greater welfare: The Jews were blacklisted as toxic to German culture. In the present era, Gloria Steinem writes, "The most dangerous situation for a woman is....a husband or lover in the isolation of their own home."
  6. Faulty science: Just as Hitler's propagandists once dismissed Albert Einstein's discoveries as "Jewish physics," feminist scholars now ridicule male scientific breakthroughs as the product of "linear" and "hierarchical" thinking.
  7. Spread of a dread disease: In Nazi Germany, Jews were falsely accused of spreading of untreatable syphilis. Now, UNICEF director Carol Belamy unfairly blames men for the spread of AIDS in Africa.
  8. Sexual contact: Hitler was obsessed with keeping Jewish men from "defiling" the racial purity of Aryan women. Now, according to Catherine McKinnon, "In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape."
But the most fascinating parallel between Germany in the 1930s and the current era lies in the conscious use of deception to sway public opinion.

In her brilliant exposé, Who Stole Feminism?, Christina Hoff Sommers documents the many fabrications of gender feminism.

Indeed, the entire ideological foundation of feminism rests on what columnist Wendy McElroy calls the "Great Lie" -- the wrong-headed notion that women are the eternal victims of male-dominated culture.

The feminist Great Lie echoes the infamous passage from Mein Kampf that says, "The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed....The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one."

The effect of the Nazi accusations was to convince the German public and the world at large that Jews were not part of humanity, and thus not deserving of fundamental human rights.

Once the dehumanization and demoralization of the Jews was complete, the stage was set for the horrors that were to commence in 1939.
So what does the future hold for the male species?
ifeminists.com: A central gathering place and information center for individualist feminists. -- explore the new feminism -- introduction | interaction | information

Further Info:

No, the Future Is Not Female

(It's funny to see how they have seemingly back-flipped on this - although it is possible that The Mandalorian is a woman under the armour.

I hope not, it really wouldn't make sense, and the character appears to be a rare positive male figure, a good father type as well as a warrior, but we shall see).

See Charlie's Angels - or the bunny gets it!!

Monday, 18 November 2019

See Charlie's Angels - or the bunny gets it!!

Feminist Director: I’m gonna make a new Charlie’s Angels!

Men: Sounds great! (* eyes glaze over *) Mmmm, Charlie's Angelssssss ... (*drools*)




Men: (*sighs*)
They always had these really sexy scenes...

Feminist Director: What? No! Eww! No! There’s no sex in Feminism! Check your Privilege! (*queefs*)

Men: Fuck that noise, then. (*grabs another beer*)

Feminist Director: You must buy tickets to my movie - or you hate women!

Men logging into cinema websites:


Feminists: Wahh! Stop seeing The Joker, you incel man-babies! Russian Bots! Narrrtt-zeees!



What gets me is not only are they relatively plain, but they don't even look convincing as fighters.

Compare that to


Women didn't want to see this - in fact, more women saw the Rambo film.

While Stewart's open mouthed emptiness might be perfect for a zombie movie, it's rather lacking for a glamorous sexy action flick, and the little girl to the right looks like she may be ready to argue about her bedtime.

Kudos to the one on the left; she accidentally does look decent for the role imo.

As Tom here points out, Stewart looks ready for a nap.

She's in her jammies and mad because her dad told her to turn off her phone and go to sleep.

The woman to her right looks hot, the one to the left ain't bad (reminds me of Buffy era Eliza Dushku), and Banks actually looks like she should be one of the angels.

As for men not seeing female led action movies...

Charlie's Angels failed because of men! Director says they hate women!


- SJWs Always Prioritize NON-Customers Over PAYING Customers

The video here is why I think Banks doesn't understand action movies. She complains that men have had a lot of them. Yes, they have. And the actors generally have to train a lot to appear in them.

Jean is an old man now, and yet he's still convincing as an action hero. He still has some pretty cool moves, even when he is just mucking about sparring with kids. And there are plenty of women who do that training too, and who also would make good action heroes.


So why doesn't someone like Banks hire them?

Because they don't hire on merit, they hire on woke points. They hire on sexuality, skin colour, religion...

They don't care about quality.

Wokeness IS quality, in their minds.

Jean Claude Van Damme Shows up to Children's Karate Class

Wednesday, 13 November 2019

“Dear Sir - Don’t Let #MeToo Make You Afraid of Me" - because then you might fight back ...


Archived from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellevate/2019/01/09/dear-sir-dont-let-metoo-make-you-afraid-of-me/

“Dear Sir - Don’t Let #MeToo Make You Afraid of Me“

Because if you are afraid, you might take defensive measures, instead of being a victim when it suits us.

“Men appear to be afraid of me.”

Feminists claim that men are the evil oppressors, yet Feminists are the ones in power, and men grovel and scrape before them. Who is oppressing whom?

“ A male superior at work asked, “Is it okay to say that?” after complimenting me on a new pair of “funky” boots. “

Not at my former workplace. Compliments were banned, for fear of sexual harassment charges. Feminists put in the laws - then moved the goalposts for them to infinity. In the UK, this even extends to asking someone what time it is.
“Another man apologized profusely after tapping my elbow. “

Feminists changed that to be assault, so at their whim, yes, they can destroy a man for tapping their elbow. If you see a Feminist about to fall into machinery, say nothing. It’s the only safe thing to do.

“ it’s more likely a sign that men are unsure of how to interact with women.”

Record everything, and don’t talk to them alone. Yes, Feminists have succeeded in the goal of splitting humanity into two segregated parts. Well done.

No wonder they are so keen on Sharia.

“It’s an unintended consequence of the movement”

Bullshit. Read “The Future is Female” to find out this has been their goal all along. They just want to keep men and women confused while they seize more and more power.

” Lean In and SurveyMonkey found that nearly half of male managers are uncomfortable participating in mentoring, working alone, or socializing together with women”

Only half? I guess the rest will learn. Do not mentor women, do not work alone or socialise with women from the workplace. In fact, at my old job, fraternisation was completely banned, to the point it occurred secretly only. Because women - generally - are heterosexual, and want men, and need men to make the first move, and without that cannot find love.

There shall be no love in the Feminist Utopia.

Feminists do not experience love, of course, and cannot comprehend that need. They despise it in men, and think it is a result of the hypnosis of Patriarchy when they see it in women.


“ A recent Harvard Business Review study exploring the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements’ impacts on creating lasting improvements in their organizations revealed some adverse reactions.”

Only some? Dividing men and women, making them enemies, only has SOME ADVERSE REACTIONS?

I have to wonder what the hell the benefits are to that, from a business perspective. I suppose you could sell both sides bullets?

“Men and women are not talking to each other. The environment is becoming sterile and completely unenjoyable to work in,”


Who could have foreseen that?


“ According to the survey, 65% of men indicated that since the movements began it’s “less safe” to mentor and coach their female colleagues. This unintentional consequence hurts the women the movement was meant to serve.”

World Ends: Women and Minorities Hardest Hit

Feminists will always spin anything that hurts men. They cannot stand seeing men being cared for.

“Strangely, it’s men who aren’t doing anything wrong who are feeling needlessly nervous”

Because the defence of innocence has been stripped away.


"why are so many men stumbling in their ordinary discourse and interactions with women at work? “

Because they know they are guilty until proven innocent - it is simply up to the whims of any woman as to whether they are sacked - or worse.

Even with Kavanaugh, with years of failure from Feminists to find anything to destroy him with, they succeeded in poisoning the well of public opinion. Control social media, and you control the minds of the masses.

"Of course, there are bad actors still lurking in the office”

Note that Feminists never admit the bad actors could be female? Only males are guilty, all women are victims, and feminists never, ever lie …

” this mistrust comes with a huge opportunity cost for working women — missing out on mentorship by men with valuable experience and skill sets to share”

If you are a woman who stood by and yawned while men had their rights stripped away, this is the future you deserve. If you are a Feminist, you cannot be surprised when the men you defecate on don’t want anything to do with you.

“Imagine if someone watched you eat for week, and pointed out all the stuff that was unhealthy, but never thought to tell you about what was healthy. “

Except that they had no science behind their beliefs, just power, the power to hurt you arbitrarily. That’s what Feminism is - power without reason, power for its own sake, the power to cause pain and the lust to glory in that pain.

"So, to all our male colleagues — it’s okay to compliment a haircut or outfit.”

No, it’s a crime thanks to Feminism. Feminists will happily lie to you to get you to do it - then turn around and destroy you the second they feel like it. Look at how Mattress Girl acted, pursuing a man, and when he said no, pretending he had raped her.

His evidence of her pursuit long after the alleged rape didn’t matter - she was supported by the University and he was hounded.

"Don’t comment on how someone’s body looks, how their appearance makes you feel, or what someone should wear.”

Stifle your feelings. Do not express emotion. Feminists hate that. It’s toxic masculinity for a man to … act like a woman.

” think about complimenting women for their work”

Because that‘s what humans do when they are attracted to each other.

Hello, work unit. Your output is: adequate. See. You. Tomorrow. [*robotic wave*]

“As for mentoring and meetings, if it’s feels uncomfortable to take a woman out to a drink, then take her to breakfast”

Whatever you do, do not take her out for breakfast. There is absolutely no reason for this not to be seen as intimate behaviour.


Only if you are prepared to record it all or have a third party as a chaperone.


Oh yes, there is no possible way a feminist wouldn’t interpret asking a woman for coffee as sexual harassment. Jesus bloody Christ, this Reeves is an idiot!

” If you are still uncertain, consider mentoring a pair of women or larger group and take them out together. “

Because it’s not like Feminists conspire when they want to get rid of someone.


“ Let the mentee drive the relationship. “

I don’t think this moron understands what a Mentor IS.

“Please tell me how often, when, and where you want to meet.”

Because women respect men who grovel and beg? JFC!

“We need to work together more now than ever. “

You had a chance to do that. You made men your enemy. It’s a bit late to whine about it now.

Feminists decided long ago that men had no place in the world. Men are starting to wake up to that.

And at some point, we are going to have to put their beliefs to the test.

But here’s the thing. It’s not the Feminists who are carrying the guns.