Tuesday, 26 November 2019

Feminist claim "The Future is Female" - but what does that mean?

The most popular Feminist slogan is a call to genocide.


Feminists cheer when they hear that men will be exterminated.

They want a future without us - but they lie, and say they want equality.

As for not having any rights until the 1960s, pfft.

Feminists don’t read history, they just listen and believe, and when another feminist says something insane, they just immediately class it as TRUTH, and there’s no second where a little voice in their head tells them to check the claim.

Kathleen Kennedy

Kathleen Kennedy remade Star Wars in a Feminist image, with the main character being a Mary Sue, and the white males being useless - or villains.

It flopped.

"The Mandalorian" was made in response to her failures, with a positive depiction of masculinity.

And Feminists are furious.


Liza Cowan

What Is Enlightenment (Susan Bridle):
Which brings us to another question I wanted to ask you. Sally Miller Gearhart, in her article “The Future If There Is One Is Female” writes:

“At least three further requirements supplement the strategies of environmentalists if we were to create and preserve a less violent world.

1) Every culture must begin to affirm the female future.

2) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture.

3) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately ten percent of the human race.”

What do you think about this statement?

Mary Daly: I
think it’s not a bad idea at all. If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males. People are afraid to say that kind of stuff anymore.

WIE: Yes. I find myself now thinking that’s a bit shocking.

: Well, it’s shocking that it would be shocking.

WIE: So it doesn’t sound like your vision of a separate nation for women is something you see as an interim stage that would eventually lead to men and women living together in true equality.

: No. That’s a very old question. I answered that to audiences twenty-five, thirty years ago. I just don’t think that way.

minists don’t want equality. They want murder.



By the way, i’ve noticed every website that includes the real meaning of “the future is female” gets shut down. Feminists are trying to erase the real meaning.

Why is that, I wonder?


ifeminists.com > introduction > editorials
Male-Bashing and a Foreboding of the Future
August 12, 2003
by Carey Roberts

When persons call for the decimation of half the world's population, that grabs my attention. This is what I'm talking about:
"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future--If There Is One--Is Female
"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." -- Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001
These proposals are disturbing in their own right. What is even more troubling is that no feminist has ever repudiated them.

When feminists call for global "decontamination" by phasing-out men, I can't help but think of the lies and accusations leveled against the Jews in Nazi Germany, and the similarities to contemporary gender feminism:

  1. Biological superiority: The National Socialists preached the genetic superiority of the Aryan race. Now, a feminist-oriented World Health Organization website claims that women enjoy an "inherent biological advantage."
  2. Sub-human: In the 1930s, the Jews were called vermin and "Judensau" (Jew-pig). Thirty years later, feminists referred to men as "male chauvinist pigs."
  3. Conspiracy theory: The Jews were often accused of "working together" to pollute German culture. Now, feminists refer to the so-called conspiracy against women as "the patriarchy."
  4. Excessive influence: Seventy years ago, Jews were accused of controlling the German economy. Now, men are accused of "having all the power."
  5. Threat to the greater welfare: The Jews were blacklisted as toxic to German culture. In the present era, Gloria Steinem writes, "The most dangerous situation for a woman is....a husband or lover in the isolation of their own home."
  6. Faulty science: Just as Hitler's propagandists once dismissed Albert Einstein's discoveries as "Jewish physics," feminist scholars now ridicule male scientific breakthroughs as the product of "linear" and "hierarchical" thinking.
  7. Spread of a dread disease: In Nazi Germany, Jews were falsely accused of spreading of untreatable syphilis. Now, UNICEF director Carol Belamy unfairly blames men for the spread of AIDS in Africa.
  8. Sexual contact: Hitler was obsessed with keeping Jewish men from "defiling" the racial purity of Aryan women. Now, according to Catherine McKinnon, "In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape."
But the most fascinating parallel between Germany in the 1930s and the current era lies in the conscious use of deception to sway public opinion.

In her brilliant exposé, Who Stole Feminism?, Christina Hoff Sommers documents the many fabrications of gender feminism.

Indeed, the entire ideological foundation of feminism rests on what columnist Wendy McElroy calls the "Great Lie" -- the wrong-headed notion that women are the eternal victims of male-dominated culture.

The feminist Great Lie echoes the infamous passage from Mein Kampf that says, "The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed....The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one."

The effect of the Nazi accusations was to convince the German public and the world at large that Jews were not part of humanity, and thus not deserving of fundamental human rights.

Once the dehumanization and demoralization of the Jews was complete, the stage was set for the horrors that were to commence in 1939.
So what does the future hold for the male species?
ifeminists.com: A central gathering place and information center for individualist feminists. -- explore the new feminism -- introduction | interaction | information

Further Info:

No, the Future Is Not Female

(It's funny to see how they have seemingly back-flipped on this - although it is possible that The Mandalorian is a woman under the armour.

I hope not, it really wouldn't make sense, and the character appears to be a rare positive male figure, a good father type as well as a warrior, but we shall see).

See Charlie's Angels - or the bunny gets it!!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please try to avoid logical fallacies!